stereoman said:davedotco said:I think it is very brave of you to try and put a 'price' on equipment that you think makes a decent stab at good reproduction and in some ways I think you have been very fair.stereoman said:tino said:stereoman said:In truth, no good hi fi can be bought new and cheap. You can forget about being happy with low to mid range hifi.
Can you define what you mean by 'cheap' or 'mid-range'? Do you have a price in mind? And at what point does mid-range stop and hi-end start?
I've always set myself an arbitrary limit of about £500(ish) per component whether new of ex-dem. With digital components or amplifiers that's reasonably easy to achieve and the quality (from my point of view and usage) is really good. New speakers or esoteric components like a good valve amplifier might need a bit more money, but still within reach without spending thousands. I don't begrudge anyone who does spend that amount of money though in pursuit of their personal happiness .. each to their own.
The price point is relative but let us say first that we need 3 basic Hi Fi components. An amp, source and loudspeakers. Let us state that cheap means indeed 500 pounds pro component. For many people the mid range budget for all three is up to 2000 pounds. Now let's focus on the loudspeakers first. The lowest (original new price) for loudspeakers who are very well arranged , win the tests with getting max rating etc. hovers in 750 pounds up to 950 pounds for bookshelves. That means that loudspeaker engineers cannot design a speaker that ticks all boxes for 350 pounds because a loudspeaker for 350 pounds although still good ( max / good rating etc ) will never be designed in a professional way. If you pull apart a 350 pound speaker you will see how each component must cost and also bring the profit back. So 100 for casing ? 50 for tweeter ? 50 for woofer ? 50 for labour ? Even when less , 50 for all the rest plus time for work and design , distribution ? Can you design a good profi speaker for this price ? So to my opinion you need to set as said the lowest possible starting cost for a professional loudspeaker. That means that a profi loudspeaker needs also earn for itsels and the company ( I do not mean putting on extra ridiuculous fake pumped up prices that will make hi fi overpriced so that will only be bought by individuals etc. ) I mean only to achieve the basis including hours of engineering work etc. including. Then add to this a profi basic amp ( again count all the components ,profi labour , design etc. ) add the source etc. So coming to conclusion - a good profi hi fi starting point for me means that new components must more or less cost around 1000 pounds each. That is over 2000 pounds without cables etc. and that is not a low budget and that is also when mid range will start to fade. If you want "a good hi fi" new ,please count with 3 up to 5 Grand for starting point. My personal opinion.
That said, I am far from in agreement, to my mind the criteria revolves the design and what the manufacturer is trying to achieve. Some even quite modestly priced components are built for performance, sound quality above all else, conversely some quite expensive components are built to other agendas.
One of my favourite amplifiers is the Croft integrated, in a suitable system it is way, way, better than it's £800 asking price would suggest, and with suitable speakers it can embarrass far more expensive setups.
This is my benchmark, the desire of the manufacturer to get the best possible performance within a particular brief, some manage that extremely well and whilst I understand the advantages in technology and production that a big manufacturer can bring, they rarely, in my opinion, hit the mark.
Yes, I'm not saying I'm right. That's why I said "personal". I believe you can have sth. cheap/er that will embarrass sth. much more expensive. But from my personal experience it's incredibly hard to built a new, "good hi fi system" with low money. To say it differently. You can go to a shop and buy a new very very good TV nowadays. A superb TV that will cost you 500 pounds. ONLY. The same TV could cost before ( only a few years ) 1800 or up to 3000 pounds when new. With laptops it is the same. Good ones can be bought for really small money. Other pieces of technology as well. BUT with hi fi - it never changes. Good Hi Fi was always expensive - is expensive - and will be expensive. I do not know myself why it is so , but it simply is. We have new great audio technology etc. but still. you cannot simply buy a good , thruthful professional sound for cheap. Simply, HiFi is extremely demanding piece of technology.
Technology certainly works for mass market product, TVs being a good example but as any 'enthusiast' knows, paying more for better performing, more specialised product is the way forward, be it TV, hi-fi or, say, bikes.
With hi-fi it is pretty difficult, so much is about how you 'feel' about a product. To continue with my earlier example, as hi-fi I would far rather have the £800 Croft integrated than say the similarly priced PM8005, despite the latter extra functionality, finish etc. And that is without even doing a comparative demonstration, my inbuilt prejudges require the Croft to be better, that's just the way it is.