Covenanter
Well-known member
My first degree was in Electronics, albeit that was before most people here were born (or even their parents were born 🙂 ). In the 3rd year (1971) I took a module on "Communications Systems" and we studied the "Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem" which is the maths behind digital-analogue conversion. (In essence it says that if you digitally sample any signal at twice the highest frequency in the signal that signal can be perfectly reconstructed from the samples.)The opposite of this could be those that can't afford to spend more on their DAC are the disbelievers ... what do you reckon 😉
Have to agree with this, I wouldn't have bought mine unless there was at least a 14 day return period and I wouldn't have kept it if it made no difference as I have lots of other hobbies to spend what's unfortunately becoming, increasingly less spare funds.
Even with what would now be viewed as stone-age technology you could reconstruct signals very accurately. By accurately I don't mean just by listening but by subtracting the reconstructed signal from the original and looking at any differences on an oscilloscope.
The maths hasn't changed but doubtless with modern technology DAC's are more accurate than they were back then. However, we are talking tiny differences between different modern DACs and, as I said in my OP, I very much doubt people can actually hear them.
Now let's discuss cables!