Was just the first picture I found, might change it later, when I’m on my PC.Always liked those wheels, though the number plate looks photoshopped.
Ah, that explains a lot.The previous owner of the car unfortunately put new lowering springs on it, so yeah it does sit too low but the springs and bushes aren't worn out.
Surprising that the bloke did it, considering he lives ten miles away in Wales.
The teledials are my favourites. Much easier to clean and look nice.Always liked those wheels, though the number plate looks photoshopped.
The only GTV I would consider is the limited edition CUP. Not my favourite shape AlfaWas just the first picture I found, might change it later, when I’m on my PC.
Nooo....there are worst things in life to be interested in. No one-upmanship as I only have a 2.0 litre. It's the only thing that's truly mine. Even the hi-fi the family use, but the car....
I'm perfectly fine to admit it....I'm a 'petrol head', except I prefer diesels, so until the price of fuel redically comes down, which I suppose it won't, that makes me a 'diesel head'. Ha ha ha.Bit of a sweeping statement there. Could be that some of us just like cars.
Speaking of which, back on topic.
I'm perfectly fine to admit it....I'm a 'petrol head', except I prefer diesels, so until the price of fuel redically comes down, which I suppose it won't, that makes me a 'diesel head'. Ha ha ha.
The only GTV I would consider is the limited edition CUP. Not my favourite shape Alfa
Yes, the later ones are the facelift version which would have the 2.0 JTS engine. Exactly the same as my 156. Little more torque & BHP than the 2.0 Twin Spark. Good engines if you refresh the oil on a regular basis and make sure the cam belt is changed every 3-4 years.I had a black 2004 GTV one of the last of them with the newer front end and different engine. That car really did fly for a 2 litre.
It had red leather seats, looked real cool... But I found it extremely uncomfortable for some reason, made my back ache, ha ha.
Definitely not the right car for me.
Cars are a bit like headphones. Doesn't matter how good they look or, how well they perform, if they're uncomfortable, you'll never enjoy using them.I had a black 2004 GTV one of the last of them with the newer front end and different engine. That car really did fly for a 2 litre.
It had red leather seats, looked real cool... But I found it extremely uncomfortable for some reason, made my back ache, ha ha.
Definitely not the right car for me.
Because it is somewhat amusing to read people fawn over a ton of sheet metal wrapped around a load of mechanical components that are destined to breakdown and that is depreciating in value every day (unless, of course, you can afford a 'real' classic).If that is howyou feel about cars, why are you posting in this thread?
In the US, you could replace "Austin Allegro" with "AMC Pacer".If your dad came home with an Austin Allegro you may as well put a bag over your head before going to school and hang your head in shame.
I de badge mine . Looks neater.Because it is somewhat amusing to read people fawn over a ton of sheet metal wrapped around a load of mechanical components that are destined to breakdown and that is depreciating in value every day (unless, of course, you can afford a 'real' classic).
I remember in the 70's (when cars actually began to become popular in the UK). Manufacturers put badges all over the vehicle advertising the engine size and the all important trim level... 1.3L 1.6GL 2.0GXL etc. It just seems to sum up the British mentality of one-upmanship and the importance of status (along with everyone knowing how old the car is from the number plate - British people are obsessed with the number plate).
If your dad came home with an Austin Allegro you may as well put a bag over your head before going to school and hang your head in shame.
Luckily my dad had a '74 Cortina 2000 and we could hold our heads up high... 97 HP and 0-60 in 10.5 seconds! Not bad for a Dagenham Dustbin.
I would actually love to have one of those Cortina's fully restored or, even better, an early 70's Consul/Granada V6... drive around like Jack Regan and George Carter (with an 8 track playing the theme tune to 'The Sweeney').
Again, rather sweeping stuff.It just seems to sum up the British mentality of one-upmanship and the importance of status (along with everyone knowing how old the car is from the number plate - British people are obsessed with the number plate).
It probably would look very out of place, among all the fat-arsed SUVs and crossovers...If I was to drive around in a 28 year old car today, it probably wouldn't look all that out of place.
It probably would look very out of place, among all the fat-arsed SUVs and crossovers...
There's plenty of late 90's vehicles on the road where I live; Jeeps, 4 Runners, Explorers, all makes of p/ups and even old Chevy sedans... no one bats an eye lid.It probably would look very out of place, among all the fat-arsed SUVs and crossovers...
Absolutely. In the Surrey area, it's awash with darn off-roaders and SUVs, along with silent assassins Tesla.It probably would look very out of place, among all the fat-arsed SUVs and crossovers...
When you gettin' one.....soon I hope.Reading a comparison with this and the McLaren F1 in this month's evo. Sounds like a hell of a car, redline of its 4l V12 660+bhp naturally-aspirated engine is 13,000.
Gordon Murray Automotive T.50 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org