JMacMan said:Just in case you're finding the hobby becoming a little, ah, obsessive....lol
A funny, but also sad description, but one I find very true from my interaction with the breed over the years...
Enjoy....
http://www.kenrockwell.com/audio/audiophile.htm
JM![]()
Because audiophiles don't have the experience or education to understand what matters (the skill of the original recording engineer, the choice of loudspeakers, their placement in a room and the acoustics of that room), audiophiles spend fortunes on the wrong things, which are the high-profit-margin and well advertised items like cables, power conditioners, amplifiers, power cables, connectors, resistors, and just about everything that has almost nothing to do with the quality of reproduced music — but makes loads of money for the people selling these fetishes.
After a quick scan of the page and alighting on this I don't think I'll bother reading it. |(KenRockwell.com said:Thank God I'm not an audiophile. Just like a pedophile, the word audiophile is defined as someone with an unhealthy attraction or interest in something; in this case, it's audio equipment, but not music.
David@FrankHarvey said:As I don't own an actual dedicated hi-fi system at the moment, been buying a lot of software, and am continually trying to expand my music collection, I can safely say I'm not an Audiophile.
Having said that, I'm not sure this is a bona fide description, especially when audiophiles are compared to paedophiles. I know the piece was written partly in jest, but that just takes things too far, suggesting they're outcasts, and the lowest of the low in today's society. Many of us would happily pull the trigger on a paedophile...
What do you call people who tinker with their car more than they drive it? Are they classed as social degenerates? Are they frowned upon? Are they ridiculed? You can take many hobbies or pastimes and say the same things about those people, but we don't - so why pick on people who like owning nice equipment and try and get the best out of it, no matter what that entails?
One of the best systems I ever heard was based around some original Quad ESLs and excessively big Musical fFdelity amplification. The whole system was a tweaker's dream - if it could be tweaked or include a tweak, he had it. Knowing the speakers and amplification at the time, I know for a fact that his system wouldn't have sounded the way it did with all the supposed nonsense removed.
steve_1979 said:An interesting read.
This is a good quote:
"A music lover will stop what he's doing and stay glued to a favorite piece of music even if it's coming over a 3" speaker or a public-address system, while an audiophile almost never enjoys music, even if played on a $100,000 hi-fi."
John Duncan said:chebby said:It's Ken Rockwell.
Like I said.
SiUK said:David@FrankHarvey
Well done, David! Exactly right, and well put. I'm a music addict, so music comes first for me, always. But I do enjoy the hobby as well, which seems to annoy the hell out of some people inhabiting the recesses here. Posts like yours (fairminded ones) and others seem to get lost amid the relentless and uncharitable posts bashing anyone that is perceived to be suggesting any measures that are even a fraction beyond what's perceived to be 'good enough and neccessary' for hi-fi. Too many asinine and absurd attempts at reductionism from people who are on a mission to reduce people's experiences to their own miserly notions of what hi-fi should be about. Some people really seem to be hate Hi-Fi and the hobby, and the people that enjoy both. As for thinking it's okay and funny to compare people who are ethusiastic about hi-fi to paedophiles, well that's pretty much an all time low.
I knew I should have left with your post. But I'm finding the incessant bashing home of 'in group' dogma quite aggravating.
steve_1979 said:even if it's coming over a 3" speaker
namefail said:You mention an ""in group"".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvmmOqNZTB8
I 'ate groops!
John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:An interesting read.
This is a good quote:
"A music lover will stop what he's doing and stay glued to a favorite piece of music even if it's coming over a 3" speaker or a public-address system, while an audiophile almost never enjoys music, even if played on a $100,000 hi-fi."
A good quote in a 'complete and utter sh-te' sort of way, I suppose.
spiny norman said:steve_1979 said:even if it's coming over a 3" speaker
Do you have to drag those old blokes in a shed into everything? :rofl:
steve_1979 said:John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:An interesting read.
This is a good quote:
"A music lover will stop what he's doing and stay glued to a favorite piece of music even if it's coming over a 3" speaker or a public-address system, while an audiophile almost never enjoys music, even if played on a $100,000 hi-fi."
A good quote in a 'complete and utter sh-te' sort of way, I suppose.
Well I like it anyway. 😛
John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:John Duncan said:steve_1979 said:An interesting read.
This is a good quote:
"A music lover will stop what he's doing and stay glued to a favorite piece of music even if it's coming over a 3" speaker or a public-address system, while an audiophile almost never enjoys music, even if played on a $100,000 hi-fi."
A good quote in a 'complete and utter sh-te' sort of way, I suppose.
Well I like it anyway. 😛
You like to think that you're more of a music lover than others on here, hm?
