jmjones said:
But you are now officially talking tripe, and insulting people. Your previous post is exactly what "expectation bias" is all about. Expecting a cheap system NOT to demonstrate a change? Why not?
I have a system of 20 years of age, service it regularly and know it well. Making a change in it is my method of improving matters, it takes some beating IMO. But you won't find me "lording it" over others.
I've tried interconnects, speaker cables, mains conditioners with very limited success over many years. Even when my system was new, and my hearing was better. Had you considered that?
A car from 20 years ago in good nick is just as good a way of testing tyres as a modern vehicle with its ABS and traction control.
And I'll say it again - If a change is detectable, good for you. If not, fine. I can imagine in some circumstances intereference could be eliminated. Other than that I suggest you stop doing others down to justify your point of view.
my point isn’t to put people’s stuff down but it’s a hard reality people in hi Fi regularly don’t admit to. Like the ‘my driving can never be beaten’ thing. And it as much applies to me.... so If I was to come on and say I’ve tried x and y unit which is compared to my kit many more times the quality or price, or however you want to measure it, I’d be mad to say that it’s rubbish because I have a self inflamed view my kit is so good, meaning x or y must not be great. That’s whats going on here.
whether it’s new or not is neither here nor there, but your speakers are from 1995 and they didn’t sell isotek Aquarius units , mentioned by Ellis, then. Also what you can get for same money in 2018 adjusted for inflation is infinetely better nowadays, so whilst you may think your speakers are of a certain quality now related to 20 years ago, I’m sure nowadays similar priced speakers adjusted for inflation, would trounce them. So from that perspective I think it will be easier to tell if these conditioners, or power leads etc make changes, because the kit will be better now, at its price.
Your argumrnt about a car of 20 years ago doesn’t hold true because it doesn’t account the value and what you get nowadays with economies of scale of production we have now. That is market forces driving down price for the same quality. It means a car now of the same price to one in the 90s and inflation adjusted, will have better features, more engine power, etc. It will be much better.
My attitude is you just have to be a realist in all of this stuff, and be objective, not one sidedly subjective. A cheap system won’t reveal a change because it won’t have the transparency, resolving power, realism and dynamic qualities of good hi Fi. That surely is blindingly obvious, just like you can’t expect a CD player for the very very best hi Fi to be better than a budget CD player in a budget system, of budget speakers and amps. Surely you accept that?