I want to replace my 20 year old Mitsubishi with a 32 or 37" flat screen. The 503 has had very good reviews and I like the idea of free HD and a good refresh rate for sports. Both are now around the £5-600 mark which is what I want to pay.
After visiting Comet, I am a little confused. The 503 had an adequate, but hardly brilliant picture, and, in common with the other LCDs in the shop, seemed to lose its colour intensity from any angle other than straight on. I was totally smitten by a 50" Panasonic VT50 which had a fabulous picture - almost like looking out of a window, but is far bigger and more expensive than I want. Also there were some comparably priced (to the 503) Samsung LED screens which seemed much sharper pictures and better colour - especially off axis, but these don't seem to rate as highly in tests.
Is the 503 only excellent against other (mediocre) LCD screens or have I just seen the result of a poor demo loop signal? Are LEDs or Plasmas generally better colour, sharper pictures and less grainy?
Help!!
After visiting Comet, I am a little confused. The 503 had an adequate, but hardly brilliant picture, and, in common with the other LCDs in the shop, seemed to lose its colour intensity from any angle other than straight on. I was totally smitten by a 50" Panasonic VT50 which had a fabulous picture - almost like looking out of a window, but is far bigger and more expensive than I want. Also there were some comparably priced (to the 503) Samsung LED screens which seemed much sharper pictures and better colour - especially off axis, but these don't seem to rate as highly in tests.
Is the 503 only excellent against other (mediocre) LCD screens or have I just seen the result of a poor demo loop signal? Are LEDs or Plasmas generally better colour, sharper pictures and less grainy?
Help!!