Cameraman:
As an existing customer, I have just had Sky+HD box "installed" forÿ£75 + £30 "standard" installation; and, only had to wait two weeks for it. However,ÿintigrating it fully toÿmy extensiveÿinstallation is proving to be a bit of a nightmare because Samsung, in its wisdom, has removed Component out from the new Sky+HD box spec. My amp is the Denon AVR 3803 through which all the variousÿkit in the system are selectably connected to both a wide screen TVÿand a H35 projector. Without boring people with the details suffice it to say that, having gone to a lot of trouble installing an HDMI to DVI cable through existingÿducting I cannot get a picture through my projector because, according to Optoma, despite having a DVI-I Dual link connector, the projector is not HDCP compliant for use with the HDMI output of the Sky box. Is it just me, or do other people find the level of knowledge and proper adviceÿamongst many so claimed "experts"ÿto beÿwoefully inadequate?
Can I ask how recent that was? and was it directly from Sky, or an independent installer??
As regards the other issue, no it's not you. I must admit I hadn't even considered the HDCP angle, although I don't think it'll be an issue in my case it's another thing to be aware of. ÿA pet hate of mine, as a law-abiding consumer that doesn't (illegally) download movies or pirate anything,ÿÿis these 'copy protection' technologies that can be got around by pirates but create all kinds of headaches and obstacles for legitimate customers. ÿIn my view, it would be better to exploit new technology as an opportunity (ie the money to be made from decent legitimate convenient and well priced digital content) rather than a threat - and remove all copy protection technologies altogether. ÿWe're gradually moving that way, and it will happen, but it's an almighty pain in the meantime!