Samsung ue65hu7500 should I buy or not ?

Jun 4, 2015
2
0
0
Hello , need some advice please !?

a local currys to me is selling off an ex display Samsung ue65hu7500 , it has had roughly 3000 hrs use and has a speaker issue ( not worried about this as I will be using my speaker and amp for sound ) .

its up for £1499 with a full 5 years guarantee , should I go for it or should I avoid like the plague ?

thanks in advance for any and all advice

nick 🙂
 
Have you demoed it? What does it look like? Any other issues. It is a good TV, you are going to have to pay about a £1000 more to get the new one. Ask them could you return it if you change your mind?
 
The price of the TV is a fair reflection of the product description.The 7500 range was a great buy in 2014.
Ask them to reduce it further....or get some cables thrown in...
LEDs have a 100,000 hour life
so lots of milelage.
 
Hi , I have seen it running etc and seems fine , the Samsung rep I spoke to said it is covered by a full 5 year guarantee which will start from day of purchase and I could get speaker issue done under that guarantee if I wanted ?

seems like a good deal but should I be worried about it being an ex display ? And the hours it's already done ?

last TV I bought was 7 years ago ( pioneer pdplx5090 )
 
Tze Kin said:
I'm reply to SL's earlier post, I doubt you can get a hdr 4k TV at 55inch or more at less than 3k at the moment?

Okay i didn't realize i thought it was on a lot of 2015 samsung models.
 
Too much confusion surrounding 4K at present, and standards haven't been finalised. I don't think you'll get full benefit of 4K at this point. Also, there's a reasonable chance that future 4K programmes may not be compatible with your TV.

I would buy a 1080p TV for now and look for 4K TV in 2016 or ideally 2017.
 
.....there are more reasons than not for 4k incl the LG Oled EG960/970...the former now with hdr capabilities.
I get this distinct impression that it is plasma owners that seem to peddle this '4k confusion'.
What confusion?

In the next two years with LEDs you will see 200Hz panels;colour gamut beyond dci p3 towards Rec 2020;TV with brighter LEDs to meet hdr demands and hdmi capable of 120fps.It is all in the pipeline.
HDR is an open format so it's welcome for Dolby Vision and Philips etc to go their own way.No confusion at all.
I accept that source material is problem now as 4k bluray will be the true UHD source but we can enjoy 4k to some degree now.
If you into gaming your 1080p games will look better in 4k than on a 1080p TV.
I would not spend the most on Samsung JS9500 yet but on an above mid range 4k TV is a worthy investment.
Consumers are buying 4k worldwide.
 
I'm not an expert on this TV..however.. I have had problems with Curry's in the past, so I would definitely not buy it from them.
 
Tze Kin said:
.....there are more reasons than not for 4k incl the LG Oled EG960/970...the former now with hdr capabilities.
I get this distinct impression that it is plasma owners that seem to peddle this '4k confusion'.
What confusion?

In the next two years with LEDs you will see 200Hz panels;colour gamut beyond dci p3 towards Rec 2020;TV with brighter LEDs to meet hdr demands and hdmi capable of 120fps.It is all in the pipeline.
HDR is an open format so it's welcome for Dolby Vision and Philips etc to go their own way.No confusion at all.
I accept that source material is problem now as 4k bluray will be the true UHD source but we can enjoy 4k to some degree now.
If you into gaming your 1080p games will look better in 4k than on a 1080p TV.
I would not spend the most on Samsung JS9500 yet but on an above mid range 4k TV is a worthy investment.
Consumers are buying 4k worldwide.

You need to get off your high horse mate. In fact, I almost bought the HU7500 until gel put his TV on sale. I don't care what technology is used, as long as the TV is good.

Read this:

http://www.whathifi.com/news/should-you-buy-4k-tv-yet
 
Nick Jeans said:
Thank you all for taking time to help , I'm still not sure what to do lol

do I don't I ? Ahhh ! I miss life being simple

If I was you I would save the money and keep your Pioneer LX5090 for now. I highly doubt the Samsung has a better picture for 1080p content, which I imagine will account for much of your viewing, and SD material will probably look better on the Pioneer as well. All you will be missing is 3D and 4K, when 3D is on the decline, and there is very little 4K content around.
 
Yes big boss, Andy clough did question the merits of buying 4k TV on the article you referred to but Becky Roberts from what hi fi also suggested the good reasons for buying a 4K TV.
I prefer a more balance view when 'giving advice' and let the buyer decide, which is what hi fi has clearly done.
 
Tze Kin said:
Yes big boss, Andy clough did question the merits of buying 4k TV on the article you referred to but Becky Roberts from what hi fi also suggested the good reasons for buying a 4K TV. I prefer a more balance view when 'giving advice' and let the buyer decide, which is what hi fi has clearly done.

You're missing the point. Probably you're not based in the UK.

The people in that article are the ones who will be responsible for bringing 4K in the UK. They're holding back until the standards are finalised. Copy pasting relevant bits of that article:

Andy Quested is the head of HD and UHD at the BBC. He says: "No, I haven't bought a 4K TV yet - I don't think they're ready. What we have at the moment is a conglomeration of three or four different [UHD} standards all vying to get to market. There are still a lot of variables: which frame rate would you like? What kind of colour do you want? Do you want HDR or standard dynamic range? What we have now is the base minimum.

"The ITU [International Telecommunication Union - a UN body for setting global technical standards] study period for UHD ends this July and then it will be six months before the next meeting, so in that time nothing happens. Currently there's a choice of five or six UHD standards, all of which work - but which one do you use?"

There are still issues around copy protection. We don't know what Hollywood will demand and if the hardware will work with that."

Chris Johns, chief engineer for broadcast strategy at Sky says, "The question for consumers is ‘when do I join the 4K revolution?’. Which standard do you define as the de facto 4K one? As broadcasters, we have to decide at what point we offer the consumer a 4K service. Personally I'm one for the big bang approach when everything is in place, rather than introducing gradual improvements. When will we have a real, full 4K standard? We're not there yet."

The official line from Sky is that "it has not got a 4K proposition to launch at this time", says Johns. But, like the BBC (which recorded the Queen's Christmas message in 4K), Sky has been playing around with 4K for some time. "The challenge is that there are different production values for, say, sport and outside broadcasts compared with drama.

When is the TV screen going to be able to deliver the big step change [in picture quality]? Current 4K TV sets won't handle HDR, nor the frame rates required for films and sport."

Simon Gauntlett, chief technology officer at the DTG, is concerned that the current somewhat confused situation around UHD standards could mislead consumers: "How do we avoid retailers mis-selling 4K TVs that may be redundant in two years? You have to be very careful in case thay are not compatible with future upgrades."

"We haven't yet agreed a combination of standards to define the UHD experience," continued Gauntlett. "That is something we are discussing in the UK UHD Forum. We need some sort of UHD-Ready label. The Blu-ray Disc Association has put a stake in the ground, but the broadcasters have not. We need to wrap it up this year and agree a standard [for broadcast 4K TV]."
 
Tze Kin said:
Yes big boss, Andy clough did question the merits of buying 4k TV on the article you referred to but Becky Roberts from what hi fi also suggested the good reasons for buying a 4K TV. I prefer a more balance view when 'giving advice' and let the buyer decide, which is what hi fi has clearly done.

you're referring to a different article. Check this one:

http://www.whathifi.com/news/should-you-buy-4k-tv-yet
 
I know it's only 55-inches but I would probably buy the LG OLED for £1900 out of John Lewis instead.
 
Nick Jeans said:
Hello , need some advice please !?

a local currys to me is selling off an ex display Samsung ue65hu7500 , it has had roughly 3000 hrs use and has a speaker issue ( not worried about this as I will be using my speaker and amp for sound ) .

its up for £1499 with a full 5 years guarantee , should I go for it or should I avoid like the plague ?

thanks in advance for any and all advice

nick 🙂

Hello Nick, when you started this thread did you have in your signature that your current television is a Pioneer LX5090? If so, I missed it. So, the issue is threefold:

One, before you saw this set being offered at Currys had you been thinking of getting another television? Two, if the answer to (1) is yes, then what size? Three, should you buy a 4K or a 1080p set?

The answer to Two is "from your current 50" Kuro, you need to go to at least 60", so thinking of a 65" set is good. To answer Three, I (and I know that I'm not quite in tune with others on this forum about this) I'm fairly equable about 4K just now, or staying with 1080p. I do understand the many good reasons for staying with 1080p, but, I must be honest here, having seen this particular Samsung model, 65HU7500, in a couple of shops, I personally would buy it at this price, I was impressed with the 2014 version of 4K technology. I'm a wee bit concerned that this particular set has done 3,000 hours in what must be about a year, hence it's been doing something like nine hours a day, which I would prefer it not to have done so much, but it's not a plasma, so no need to worry about screen burn ....... This Samsung is a very good upscaler of lower-resolution material, so you'll be able to play your Blu-rays and even Standard-Definition material with confidence. The £1,499 price, for last year's 4K technology, is what you would have to pay for a current model 65-inch Full HD anyway. See these reviews http://www.whathifi.com/samsung/ue65hu7500/review or http://www.trustedreviews.com/samsung-ue65hu7500-review or https://www.avforums.com/review/samsung-hu7500-ue65hu7500-ultra-hd-4k-3d-led-lcd-tv-review.10786 .
 
Tze Kin said:
.....there are more reasons than not for 4k incl the LG Oled EG960/970...the former now with hdr capabilities. I get this distinct impression that it is plasma owners that seem to peddle this '4k confusion'. What confusion?

In the next two years with LEDs you will see 200Hz panels;colour gamut beyond dci p3 towards Rec 2020;TV with brighter LEDs to meet hdr demands and hdmi capable of 120fps.It is all in the pipeline. HDR is an open format so it's welcome for Dolby Vision and Philips etc to go their own way.No confusion at all. I accept that source material is problem now as 4k bluray will be the true UHD source but we can enjoy 4k to some degree now. If you into gaming your 1080p games will look better in 4k than on a 1080p TV. I would not spend the most on Samsung JS9500 yet but on an above mid range 4k TV is a worthy investment. Consumers are buying 4k worldwide.

have you actually compared, 4k LCD, plasma and OLED 1080p together? I suspect not! Myself and big brother have. My advice to you is to go and view for your self.

1080p upscaled to 4 k will not look better; only native 4k will look better.

Until UHD comes out on bluray, then there is no point upgrading until there is plenty of content and the standard is out, up and running and finalised. Or, if you need a new TV because it's broken.

i am a plasma owner, but don't give a damn if it its plasma, OLED or LCD. I only purchase for the best picture qaulity I can afford and this was only 18 months ago when I bought my lovely VT plasma... What's the point in buying 4k for me, none. My TV is not old hat as youve previously stated in other posts, it's a damn good flag ship TV, even now plasma is no longer in production.

you could also say this about the Kuro when this died, it still has never been beaten by other plasmas for deep blacks, although the Panasonic GT, VT and ZT are not far behind if not equal....
 
Hello

again thank you everyone that took time to help me , even those that decided to have a little argument in the middle 🙂 lol

i decided to go ahead and buy the TV , I have to say it is a massive improvement and I feel as though I 100% got a lot for my money ! Amazing picture !!!

upscaled hd is brilliant and I don't regret upgrading , I only wish I had managed to find a 55" model , was a massive jump from 50 to 65 but for the money I can't really complain

so thanks again everyone ! I'll be back in a few months when I will want to upgrade my amp/receiver 🙂

nick
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts