Nick Jeans said:
i decided to go ahead and buy the TV , I have to say it is a massive improvement and I feel as though I 100% got a lot for my money ! Amazing picture !!!
Hello again Nick, I was going to tell you about this anyway, to help you make up your mind, and now it reinforces your decision to buy. If you buy the current (July 2015, number 248) of Home Cinema Choice magazine, on page 76 the Editor, Mark Craven, reports on having had a Samsung UE65HU8200 television at home for the past seven months. This is curved rather than flat like yours, but is the same generation as yours, and very much the same standard of machine. Mr Craven writes "I can safely say that having a 4K panel, even at a time when 4K source material is astonishingly rare, is consistently rewarding. This is because Samsung's upscaling engine is supremely efficient. Full HD Blu-rays remapped to the 3840 X 2160 resolution are capable of jaw-dropping clarity, especially when there's not much motion in the frame to overwhelm the Quad Core-powered processing. Watching quality HD platters such as Edge of Tomorrow and Lucy has proved stunning, with refined pixel detail, and broadcast hd looks naturally sharp too." In fact, I would urge you to buy the magazine, because elsewhere Mr Craven mentions the screen settings that he has made to get the best picture, and some of those settings may be valid for your UE65HU7500 television also. I'm glad that you've bought it, and even more glad that you are so happy with it! You could consider getting it professionally calibrated, it is well run in now. Calibration will cost about £200 to £250.
Nick Jeans said:
upscaled hd is brilliant and I don't regret upgrading , I only wish I had managed to find a 55" model , was a massive jump from 50 to 65 but for the money I can't really complain
Here, my friend, I flatly and massively disagree with you. I'm glad that you couldn't find a 55-inch model. Going from your existing lovely 50-inch Pioneer LX5090 to a 55-inch machine, albeit a 4K one,
would have been a waste of money. The increase in size would not have been noticeable, you needed to go to at least 60 inches. I can say this with certainty because, in 2009, I went from a 42-inch Pioneer plasma to a 50-inch Pioneer plasma (the same model as your old one!) and NOBODY, out of about eight people over a few weeks, noticed the size increase, eight inches just wasn't enough! So it's good that you have bought a 65-inch set, after your 50-inch Pioneer. By the way, what will happen to your Pioneer LX5090? Maybe I can persuade you not to sell it, it's still a wonderful machine, but to demote it to the kitchen or to a bedroom, which is what I did with mine three years ago!