aliEnRIK
New member
D.J.KRIME:aliEnRIK:thelegendarymonch:Oh and don't get me started on Kuros, as good as they were, they were NOT the best plasmas out there.
Interesting post up until you said that. Your so very wrong about that. But sure, im intrigued as to which plasma was better too?
Depends if your taking their proformance into account using the pound for pound basis, for example my Samsung PS50P96 was a 5star product as was the Pioneer LX508 at the time, both were Full HD etc but My Samsung was £1200 and the Pioner £2800 so that made the Pioneer roughly 133% more expensive but was the proformance of the Pioneer 133% better than my Samsung?? Nope at best IMHO about 5%. So again IMHO the extra outlay was not worth the limited gain so I purchased the Samsung as IMHO it was a better TV on a pound for pound basis.
The 500A is the best 'out of the box' tv there is. Even ISF calibrations have never moved more than a single notch plus or minus. Its still to this day the reference tv to compare all other tvs, regardless of price
Interesting post up until you said that. Your so very wrong about that. But sure, im intrigued as to which plasma was better too?
Depends if your taking their proformance into account using the pound for pound basis, for example my Samsung PS50P96 was a 5star product as was the Pioneer LX508 at the time, both were Full HD etc but My Samsung was £1200 and the Pioner £2800 so that made the Pioneer roughly 133% more expensive but was the proformance of the Pioneer 133% better than my Samsung?? Nope at best IMHO about 5%. So again IMHO the extra outlay was not worth the limited gain so I purchased the Samsung as IMHO it was a better TV on a pound for pound basis.
The 500A is the best 'out of the box' tv there is. Even ISF calibrations have never moved more than a single notch plus or minus. Its still to this day the reference tv to compare all other tvs, regardless of price