Hi members,
I'm planning on stepping into the surround experience.
I've listened to the Q Acoustic 3050 (front), 3020 (back) and 3090c (center) in some HiFi shop nearby. I was very pleased with the 3050 and 3020, they sounded really well to my opinion, but the center sounded like garbage. Voices where really muffled.
When I replaced the 3090c speaker with a 3020 (bookshelf speaker) the sound was much more natural and clear. Even in a 4.0 setup (3050 front, 3020 back) it was a much better experience than the 5.0 setup with the center speaker.
I have been told that this was due to the M-T-M (mid, treble, mid) design of such a speaker, so that it fits under or above a tv: aesthetics over sound quality. A vertically desinged speaker almost always sound better and putting 2 mid-drivers in one speaker does not help improve sound quality either, they told me.
They had no other setups where they used a center speaker, they had dedicated theaters but all with 3 front speakers, where 1 acts as a center speaker. So I could not compare it to other center speakers.
Overall the reviews for all these Q Acoustic speakers are very good, even for the center speaker (https://www.whathifi.com/q-acoustics/3000-series-51-cinema-pack/review). "This package offers a rounded sound, occupying a comfortable spot between excitement and refinement. It’s a hugely insightful sound, packed with the subtlest of textures. If you’re after a nuanced listen, this is it.". Maybe I had just a bad center, could that be it? When I arrived the center speaker did not function and they replaced it with a new one, so it had 0 playing hours, also something to keep in mind.
Are there people out here that experience the same with this paritcular center speaker? Or other center speakers?
What would you guys recommend, go for another set with a better center speaker? Go for a 4.0 setup? Or a 5.0 setup and maybe interchange the 3090c with a bookshelf 3020 speaker?
I'm planning on stepping into the surround experience.
I've listened to the Q Acoustic 3050 (front), 3020 (back) and 3090c (center) in some HiFi shop nearby. I was very pleased with the 3050 and 3020, they sounded really well to my opinion, but the center sounded like garbage. Voices where really muffled.
When I replaced the 3090c speaker with a 3020 (bookshelf speaker) the sound was much more natural and clear. Even in a 4.0 setup (3050 front, 3020 back) it was a much better experience than the 5.0 setup with the center speaker.
I have been told that this was due to the M-T-M (mid, treble, mid) design of such a speaker, so that it fits under or above a tv: aesthetics over sound quality. A vertically desinged speaker almost always sound better and putting 2 mid-drivers in one speaker does not help improve sound quality either, they told me.
They had no other setups where they used a center speaker, they had dedicated theaters but all with 3 front speakers, where 1 acts as a center speaker. So I could not compare it to other center speakers.
Overall the reviews for all these Q Acoustic speakers are very good, even for the center speaker (https://www.whathifi.com/q-acoustics/3000-series-51-cinema-pack/review). "This package offers a rounded sound, occupying a comfortable spot between excitement and refinement. It’s a hugely insightful sound, packed with the subtlest of textures. If you’re after a nuanced listen, this is it.". Maybe I had just a bad center, could that be it? When I arrived the center speaker did not function and they replaced it with a new one, so it had 0 playing hours, also something to keep in mind.
Are there people out here that experience the same with this paritcular center speaker? Or other center speakers?
What would you guys recommend, go for another set with a better center speaker? Go for a 4.0 setup? Or a 5.0 setup and maybe interchange the 3090c with a bookshelf 3020 speaker?