aliEnRIK
New member
The_Lhc said:Ok, that's useful information, cheers.
No worries
Just so your aware though, most of what I wrote wasnt directed at you at all, more the posters in general on here (Im sure they know who they are to a degree)
The_Lhc said:Ok, that's useful information, cheers.
aliEnRIK said:The_Lhc said:Yes, I'm worried about that, even the DVDs show the model work too faithfully for it to remain realistic, I'm a little surprised George hasn't CGI'd the whole lot yet (perhaps he's saving that for the 3D versions...).
hmmmm
See, the last 3 star wars 'CGI'ed to hell were awful.
I would personally like 2 versions of the originals -
warts and all (Uprated sound though)
and added cgi but well done cgi - as in genuinely makes the film seem better (If he can actually manage that task - im beginning to think not). As with anything of this nature - less is more (Something I wish george would learn)
aliEnRIK said:The_Lhc said:Ok, that's useful information, cheers.
No worries
Just so your aware though, most of what I wrote wasnt directed at you at all, more the posters in general on here (Im sure they know who they are to a degree)
the trouble is rik is that you place an awful lot of trust in your own judgement, and often state as fact that there are differences in all sorts of av related things based on that judgement, even though there is never any proof of these differences, only your word on them..aliEnRIK said:maxflinn said:yet you can presumably recall a moving photographic image of the picture on your tv in the evening, and somehow compare it with the picture on your tv at 4am, then declare as fact that there is a noticeable difference?
When I was talking about ABX etc I was talking about sound (Thus - the switch box)
I can tell straight away if my tv is displaying a better picture than normal or not
Clare Newsome said:Blu-rays i've been particularly disappointed by (but fortunately saw here before I parted with any cash) are Bram Stoker's Dracula
The_Lhc said:what's wrong with it?
professorhat said:The_Lhc said:what's wrong with it?
Keanu Reeves' performance was enough to ensure I never watch it again. It literally made me angry!
Clare Newsome said:The picture quality could/should be better (decent LPCM soundtrack, tho). I don't object to it looking grainy - it's a film largely shot in low light, after all - but the contrast and colour were disappointing.
professorhat said:The_Lhc said:what's wrong with it?
Keanu Reeves' performance was enough to ensure I never watch it again. It literally made me angry!
Meh, he's not as bad as the obvious use of a toy train set in there! I'd forgotten about that.Clare Newsome said:
The_Lhc said:Meh, he's not as bad as the obvious use of a toy train set in there! I'd forgotten about that.Clare Newsome said:
The_Lhc said:Meh, he's not as bad as the obvious use of a toy train set in there! I'd forgotten about that.Clare Newsome said:
manicm said:Frankly I think all modern Dracula movies were rubbish. This is one story that's begging for a proper re-boot on screen.