PMC Twenty5.22 vs Twenty.22

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.
nopiano said:
I can't believe the 25 are worth 2.5 times more, so I'd choose the 20s for a grand. And spend the rest on music or your sources (not that i'm saying there's anything wrong in that department).

The 20.22 price is for a used pair in perfect condition.

The price difference between the two is indeed substantial.
 
nopiano said:
I agree too. As you've already moved on from LS50s there's not much to suggest without spending a lot. Have you ever heard Sonus faber Veneres?

Not yet.
 
ErwinC said:
nopiano said:
I agree too. As you've already moved on from LS50s there's not much to suggest without spending a lot. Have you ever heard Sonus faber Veneres?

Not yet.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Sonus-Faber-Venere-1-5-Speakers-and-Stands-Gloss-Black-/152195856437?hash=item236f947835:g:Lg8AAOSwt7ZXpeA0

Same price as the twenty.22 not new! But essential that you hear. You'll either love them or....prefer PMC!
 
David@FrankHarvey said:
They're certainly on my radar come my next upgrade.

Hi David,

Just interested: do you still have the same opinion on the new PMC Twenty5.22 and other Twenty5 models at this moment? Do you use them in your setup or did you go for the actvive PMC speakers?
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts