acalex said:Now...what do you think Roby thought about it? Was he so impressed to take the deal? :? :silenced: :shifty:
I think I know exactly what Roby thought, but we shall see! :silenced:
acalex said:Now...what do you think Roby thought about it? Was he so impressed to take the deal? :? :silenced: :shifty:
Jambalaya said:You would probably be happier with the M6i, not just because I have one, but because of the power based on the type of music you indicate you prefer. Naim is very dynamic and sophisticated sound, no problem driving any loudspeaker, but for sheer power and control of bass frequency, the M6i is awesome plus it is very dynamic as well. What you feed it is what you'll get back so quality recordings really shine and poor quality recordings...well you can tell they are poor quality.
Jambalaya said:You would probably be happier with the M6i, not just because I have one, but because of the power based on the type of music you indicate you prefer. Naim is very dynamic and sophisticated sound, no problem driving any loudspeaker, but for sheer power and control of bass frequency, the M6i is awesome plus it is very dynamic as well. What you feed it is what you'll get back so quality recordings really shine and poor quality recordings...well you can tell they are poor quality.
iceman16 said:Jambalaya said:You would probably be happier with the M6i, not just because I have one, but because of the power based on the type of music you indicate you prefer. Naim is very dynamic and sophisticated sound, no problem driving any loudspeaker, but for sheer power and control of bass frequency, the M6i is awesome plus it is very dynamic as well. What you feed it is what you'll get back so quality recordings really shine and poor quality recordings...well you can tell they are poor quality.
Have you heard the AMS 35i?
acalex said:Here the videos, enjoy
Video 1: http://youtu.be/RkM6Zm7RCYM
Video 2: http://youtu.be/Tt5_gNIeJeY
Video 3: http://youtu.be/l1up0uvnhsE
Jambalaya said:You would probably be happier with the M6i, not just because I have one, but because of the power based on the type of music you indicate you prefer. Naim is very dynamic and sophisticated sound, no problem driving any loudspeaker, but for sheer power and control of bass frequency, the M6i is awesome plus it is very dynamic as well. What you feed it is what you'll get back so quality recordings really shine and poor quality recordings...well you can tell they are poor quality.
Macspur said:acalex said:Here the videos, enjoy
Video 1: http://youtu.be/RkM6Zm7RCYM
Video 2: http://youtu.be/Tt5_gNIeJeY
Video 3: http://youtu.be/l1up0uvnhsE
Thanks for these Alex... difficult to judge the SQ through my PC speakers, but can perhaps detect that aggression you refer to, then again may be just the tracks played.
Bet it was stunning in the flesh.
Cheers
Mac
Roby said:Also the speakers where not set up properly they didnd't put theme on the spikes witch is provably importand as the bass ports are under the soeaker.
Roby said:But here one's tha ams warmed up it was a completly other story it had all the quality's of the Idea in terms of transparency an accurasy but it take the edge of witch made it much warmer an rounder without getting muddy it had an incredable punch.
On the live acoustic of Niels lofgren you could here the riffs to perfectoin without getting earbreaking high like I heard on some other systems. The Bass was deep warm an room filling we had a few tracks with us tu test that like the start of "the man in the black coate"
Than the voice it was clear an amazinly deep it was like it was adding an octave with made it sweet.
So my first impression was that you lose no detail at all but thank to the incredable low it never get analitical.The mid showed deffenatly the accurasy of the speaker. There is a lot of space an the speaker is really roomfilling. An the bass was always in controle not once I had this trompet effect I complained about earlier in this treat.
Roby said:So I think but I might be wrong here the speakers being rated at 4ohm it dubbles the the ams is rated 70/chanel can that be the reason for this?
Roby said:Than what about the cdp I think it was truly amazing I can't tell much about it cause I have no real comparesion.
Roby said:We also tested the difference between RCA ( audioquest Diamondback) & XLR (Audioquest Colombia)
The first big difference was the volume level an the xlr connection being bit more punchy witch is good for electronic music as I find electronic music sounding a bit slow on high end systems So really telling you what I prefer at this point I can't rca being a bit more calm an laid back in opposite to xlr being more punchy an cristaline on detail I mean daitail is there on bothe but with xlr it comming more to the front, this might be a bit tiering in long listeng sessions I guess.
I think when I upgrade the cdp I will buy both an switch untill I find what suits me best t(altruegh I have already an idear but I tell you later.
Roby said:An have to say I was immidiatly impressed an could fully understand why you would connect theme to an AMS. An that for such a small speaker, well oké it are stand mount's but they are not that small....
Roby said:Than I was immidiatly missing an octove on the low department....bass was there but not in the same way. An here it was again not al the time but somtimes that trompet effect witch make me feel the amp is loosing controle. bur to be honest it was not distubing at all here. I was realy impressed by the mid range an the clarity of the high. There was this effect in space I like but it made it some times almost artificial. An than they where of course less roomfilling ass the Ascendent.
I also tried to switch rca an xlr an here no question ask to me connect witxlr was much better
Detail, punch, an controle wher way better. To be honnest it's a superb speaker an If I buy tose I'm shure I would be happy for year's.
Roby said:Then when I came home I realised It was actualy the first time in a while I really enjoyed my music during an demo. Being not to analitical but yust enjoying. Witch provably say alot about the quality of the equipment. Last time I remember having this feeling in a demo was when we went to listen to the Sugden. An than also to the audio research mono blocks but that's out of my budget so it's not realy the same.
Roby said:So as you can Imagine I made a desiscion........But it's provably obious ;-)
Roby said:Stangly I have the impression in this moment I have more effect on my speakers upgrading the source than when I upgraded the amp but than I'm thinking its provably my memmory playing tricks with me.
I'm actualy more thinking it's combination of the amp+source upgrade ho have this effect, it's a more logical explenation.
CnoEvil said:Roby said:Also the speakers where not set up properly they didnd't put theme on the spikes witch is provably importand as the bass ports are under the soeaker.
CnoEvil said:If this remained unchanged through the demo, it was far from ideal, and should never have happened.....I think these speakers have more to give when properly set up.
CnoEvil said:exactly imagine what's in to it when it's properly set up
Roby said:An have to say I was immidiatly impressed an could fully understand why you would connect theme to an AMS. An that for such a small speaker, well oké it are stand mount's but they are not that small....
CnoEvil said:The Diablos are one of the biggest standmounts around, and a very difficult load for an amp. If you started ramping up the volume, the 35i could show signs of strain. In fact the bigger Utopias would be easier to drive.
CnoEvil said:Yes amazing clear speaker but likz I said afther listening to the avalon's it almost sound artificail en less warm than the Ascenden'ts
Roby said:Than I was immidiatly missing an octove on the low department....bass was there but not in the same way. An here it was again not al the time but somtimes that trompet effect witch make me feel the amp is loosing controle. bur to be honest it was not distubing at all here. I was realy impressed by the mid range an the clarity of the high. There was this effect in space I like but it made it some times almost artificial. An than they where of course less roomfilling ass the Ascendent.
I also tried to switch rca an xlr an here no question ask to me connect witxlr was much better
Detail, punch, an controle wher way better. To be honnest it's a superb speaker an If I buy tose I'm shure I would be happy for year's.
CnoEvil said:The Diablos are a speaker I admire, rather than love. They are ultra clean, controlled and articulate with great imaging, but (for me) don't engender an emotive reaction.
CnoEvil said:Altrue like you say I think the diablos benefit from the xlr connection so yes the sound quality also depend of your interconnects an the system where in you use them. an in this case I think the diablos benefit's from thr xlr connection.
Roby said:So as you can Imagine I made a desiscion........But it's provably obious ;-)
CnoEvil said:Though I think that in all likelyhood you have found your perfect speaker, you should try, if possible, to listen to the 205/2s.....to be sure, to be sure (as they don't say in Ireland)
Cno
Hey what can I say look at the bright side for thr price I payed the Avalon's I can always change if I want in the future without loosing to much money ;-)
CnoEvil said:Roby said:Also the speakers where not set up properly they didnd't put theme on the spikes witch is provably importand as the bass ports are under the soeaker.
CnoEvil said:If this remained unchanged through the demo, it was far from ideal, and should never have happened.....I think these speakers have more to give when properly set up.
CnoEvil said:exactly imagine what's in to it when it's properly set up
Roby said:An have to say I was immidiatly impressed an could fully understand why you would connect theme to an AMS. An that for such a small speaker, well oké it are stand mount's but they are not that small....
CnoEvil said:The Diablos are one of the biggest standmounts around, and a very difficult load for an amp. If you started ramping up the volume, the 35i could show signs of strain. In fact the bigger Utopias would be easier to drive.
CnoEvil said:Yes amazing clear speaker but likz I said afther listening to the avalon's it almost sound artificail en less warm than the Ascenden'ts
Roby said:Than I was immidiatly missing an octove on the low department....bass was there but not in the same way. An here it was again not al the time but somtimes that trompet effect witch make me feel the amp is loosing controle. bur to be honest it was not distubing at all here. I was realy impressed by the mid range an the clarity of the high. There was this effect in space I like but it made it some times almost artificial. An than they where of course less roomfilling ass the Ascendent.
I also tried to switch rca an xlr an here no question ask to me connect witxlr was much better
Detail, punch, an controle wher way better. To be honnest it's a superb speaker an If I buy tose I'm shure I would be happy for year's.
CnoEvil said:The Diablos are a speaker I admire, rather than love. They are ultra clean, controlled and articulate with great imaging, but (for me) don't engender an emotive reaction.
CnoEvil said:Altrue like you say I think the diablos benefit from the xlr connection so yes the sound quality also depend of your interconnects an the system where in you use them. an in this case I think the diablos benefit's from thr xlr connection.
Roby said:So as you can Imagine I made a desiscion........But it's provably obious ;-)
CnoEvil said:Though I think that in all likelyhood you have found your perfect speaker, you should try, if possible, to listen to the 205/2s.....to be sure, to be sure (as they don't say in Ireland)
Cno
Hey what can I say look at the bright side for thr price I payed the Avalon's I can always change if I want in the future without loosing to much money ;-)
iceman16 said:Thanks Roby...that was very interesting read BTW did you found the Diablo's a bit lacking in low frequency? If so..you might as well try the Electra 1028be.
Macspur said:So glad to have this thread back, I was beginning to get a little disinterested in the forum for a while there.
Roby, the EMC1UP, certainly in my set up, sounds far better with XLR connection... top loading won't be a problem, as even if you have to have it on a lower shelf, the lid just slides back.
Mac
Macspur said:So glad to have this thread back, I was beginning to get a little disinterested in the forum for a while there.
Roby, the EMC1UP, certainly in my set up, sounds far better with XLR connection... top loading won't be a problem, as even if you have to have it on a lower shelf, the lid just slides back.
Mac
Roby said:Macspur said:So glad to have this thread back, I was beginning to get a little disinterested in the forum for a while there.
Roby, the EMC1UP, certainly in my set up, sounds far better with XLR connection... top loading won't be a problem, as even if you have to have it on a lower shelf, the lid just slides back.
Mac
;-) don't worry I still have a fiew upgredes to go trough... Next one provably being the CDP But first I have to start saving again ;-)
Macspur said:Roby said:Macspur said:So glad to have this thread back, I was beginning to get a little disinterested in the forum for a while there.
Roby, the EMC1UP, certainly in my set up, sounds far better with XLR connection... top loading won't be a problem, as even if you have to have it on a lower shelf, the lid just slides back.
Mac
;-) don't worry I still have a fiew upgredes to go trough... Next one provably being the CDP But first I have to start saving again ;-)
I fully understand Roby... expensive game this HiFi lark! but when you get it right, well worth it.
As a matter of interest, how much are the Avalons going for?
Mac