Clare Newsome:
Firstly, we're not 'plugging' anything - we reviewed sets that looked (and still look, as anyone who saw them on display at our Show last week could have told you) absolutely superb: as many people on this thread with Sony sets have agreed with. I can assure you - with all the evidence you want - that there's no link between advertising and editorial on WHF.
Secondly, as soon as this issue was brought to our attention we've been pushing Sony for an answer, as there are obviously a bad batch of sets out there - including ones sent to some other reviewers - and Sony must account for this.
Whereas I agree its not WHF's fault as they can only test the product as sent to them, surely given the high level of customer dissatisfaction / reported alleged problems with this model, shouldn't WHF post an addendum to their review to the effect;
"Given the High Level of customer problems / dissatisfaction reported with this model in respect of clouding, WHF no longer feel able to stand by the original rating as given to the sample we tested and thus we are downgrading our review to 1 star and no longer recommending its purchase".
I have to agree with a previous poster, that many people purchase products soley based on WHF ratings and so to allow ratings to stand on products which clearly have what appear to be quite widely reported alleged problems is irresponisble in my opinion. Also, the biggest persuader out there for somone like Sony to tackle this issue is surely produced by respected review magazines regrading their product and recommendations in the light of those alleged problems.