the issue I have was yes I was going for the SB2000 but could not get a demo on one at my local hifi shop and the salesman showed me the top line Dali sub which cost £900 with not meany settings on it and it was not a sealed sub but the Rel was so I had a demo and it sounded pretty good and the fact it has lots of different settings on the back of it and good build quality it was worth a home demo .CnoEvil said:Blacksabbath25 said:I had a demo today at richer sounds and it sounded pretty good if it's no good at home I can take it back but it did sound ok in storebigboss said:Interesting that you've gone for an 8 inch 200W subwoofer instead of a 12 inch 500W SB2000 for the same price. Aesthetics?Blacksabbath25 said:i have ended up buying the Rel T71 today £50 saving of the asking price
I share BB's concern.
The cost of the Rel is 850....so I assume you got it for 800....which is the same price as the SB2000.
Also, the BK XLS 200 has a more powerful Amp (275W vs 200W); has a bigger driver (10" [Peerless] vs 8"); goes deeper (17 Hz vs 30 Hz @ -6dB) and cheaper for the Gloss Black (395 vs 800).
It's your money and your decision, but do give this some thought, as expediancy may not be the right way to go.
the salesman said if it not as powerful as you want it at home bring it back but I had to pay for it there and then before I could have a home demo with one if it rubbish at home I will get the SB2000 .
i will not be using the sub for music only films as I've kept my music side separate from films my opticon 8s go down low and did not want to add a sub to the 8s for music because the 8s have loads of bass and my A-S2100 amplifier has good bass control .