alwaysbeblue1 said:
Seems to suggest that there is probably no increase in quality from say a 500 amp to a 1500 amp but you may get a different sound that you like.
So why not spend 500 and find an amp that you like the sound of
I still find it strange that someone will spend say 1500 on an amp that they know has no real extra quality over a 500 amp, but almost convince yourself that it does or at least enough to warrant an extra 1000.
The only big difference I have noticed is in my speakers, from 900 dynaudio to 2500 spendor a6r. Listening to different amps at this stage seems to make no real difference at all
the money numbers you quote are almost exactly the difference in my amps. The Yam does sound nice, as long as the volume is midway. Low volume material is very vague and lacking detail. High volume and my transmission line speakers start controlling the amp instead of v-versa. After a few demo's from different manufacturers it became plainly obvious the amp was lacking but at the end of the day it's a budget amp. In a back-to-back test with the Yamaha in its mid-volume stride, it sounds good; my Vincent, at roughly the same volume level, sounds good too. The giveaway is the bass control, the Vincent clearly is far better (at any level) and so were all the amps I auditioned. As I was trying to point out many posts ago, the speaker/amp relationship is very relative on size/design/drivers. Auditioning is a must. I wouldn't spend money on something I couldn't justify shelling out for but the differences in my amps made buying the Vincent easily the best money I've spent in a long time.