[quote user="fr0g"][quote user="al7478"][quote user="fr0g"][quote user="al7478"]Thanks john - no idea about Apple TV so ill have a look. fr0g - Windows doesnt play with flac without tweakes either tho. But you have made me think, and ive just realised flac isnt recognised by nero, and i dont think apple lossless is either. Now, i dont often use it nowadays, but i do need to make the odd cd or data dvd. So that leads me to think that id be better of using a pc to rip to flac then rip separately in high quality mp3, or jsut find a prog thatll do Good Quality mp3 batch conversion from flac.[/quote]
Windows supports FLAC if you don't use the awful WMP program. I use Winamp.
Pretty sure Nero works ok with FLAC too (maybe need a plugin). But I use free software to do everything that nero does anyway.[/quote]
Good point well made actually (but wouldnt the same be true of a mac?). Just a point of interest, i once thought you didnt like the sound of wmp, but then we established it sounds the same as winamp et al, i went back to it. Not sure what you dont like about it, but I've not found anything else objectionable i dont think.[/quote]
A little misunderstanding I think. All playback sounds the same using windows standard drivers. Winamp and Foobar (maybe others) can utilise the Asio4all driver which further increases quality.
ie there is no difference between any playback software in playback quality without tweaking. It's the rest of the package that irritates me with bothe WMP and iTunes.... Both imo rubbish...especially if you are lazy enough to use them to rip CDs.
Also I only use Winamp for playback. I was using other software such as media monkey and one I have forgotten the name of, as good music cataloguers, but have reverted to self organisation of folders, which imo is the best way to go. I guess its because I'm a programmer, and have a need to know exactly whats going on, rather than trusting (usually) dodgy databases. I even use my squeezebox by Music folder rather than DB.[/quote]
Cerainly agree with you on the ripping, as you know. When I've got things fully sorted - and if thats with windows - I'll be using a combination of DB and folders, But mostly rely on playlists i think. Yes, way back when, you see, i thought it was the sound quality you objected to, and even agreed myself, before i played about a bit. As you'll know tho, i miss understood your objection, and discovered, as you say, that there is no playback difference. Thats what i was getting at in my cack-handed way. If i go the apple route I'll probably give Asio a miss, and would probably do likewise if i went the windows route. You've just hinted at a third possibility tho - using alternative playback software for playback, and still bringing the TV in. But that would mean foobar 2000 or winamp, then navigating to my files (made up as playlists already) on the TV, and selecting to play them with winamp or whatever. By remote. I'm only guessing, but I'm thinking "probably not that simple...". As for VNP software - that apple remote desktop is a bit pricey and I'm not even sure it would do what i want. Maybe i have to get used to the idea of using a keybord and mouse with it. I'd have to use that to copy stuff off external hdd anyway. It'll be a bit uncomfortable as it wont be at my desk, but i might have to live with it. Incidentally, does apple lossless support tags...?