Goodbye Qobuz, hello Spotify Lossless!

record_spot

Well-known member
May 30, 2015
684
557
19,770
I've had a Spotify account for about 15 years. Even went down the paid Spotify premium route for a few years. About two years ago, I jumped ship to Qobus, wound down my Spotify Premium and went with the free service as I liked the interface for the Podcast capability Spotify took on.

And I really liked Qobuz. Great service, good connectivity, heaps of new releases to get into and the rest.

Then along came Spotify Lossless. Initially, my thoughts were "whoop" in a slightly ironic, highly pass-ag manner. And then I had a listen and a bit of a think.

The interface, while a tad busier, is still heaps ahead of the rest. Slick, smart and just works seamlessly. And the audio quality? Heck, it's pretty damn good!

So, I let the Qobuz subscription run down. The Spotify Premium's been renewed and is there a difference?

I don't think I really care...!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Messiah
I've had a Spotify account for about 15 years. Even went down the paid Spotify premium route for a few years. About two years ago, I jumped ship to Qobus, wound down my Spotify Premium and went with the free service as I liked the interface for the Podcast capability Spotify took on.

And I really liked Qobuz. Great service, good connectivity, heaps of new releases to get into and the rest.

Then along came Spotify Lossless. Initially, my thoughts were "whoop" in a slightly ironic, highly pass-ag manner. And then I had a listen and a bit of a think.

The interface, while a tad busier, is still heaps ahead of the rest. Slick, smart and just works seamlessly. And the audio quality? Heck, it's pretty damn good!

So, I let the Qobuz subscription run down. The Spotify Premium's been renewed and is there a difference?

I don't think I really care...!
That's why I can't give up my Roon subscription, the interface is just so good.... If I had Qubuz sound quality, Roon's interface and Spotify's vast library.....if only Carlsberg were in the music streaming business.....it would probably be ........🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: record_spot
I personally wouldn't subscribe to a music streaming service from my own pocket, but if I did, it'd be with one that paid artists more.

Yep, well I did Qobuz which is I think one of the higher payers. None of them get anywhere near the cut that physical media did.

I recall an article on who got paid what years ago on physical media. I think the artist still very much got the thin end of the wedge; something like £1 (before tax) on a £15.99 CD...way better than streaming obviously, but then I tend to look at streaming as free advertising. The stuff I listen to and like, I'll buy. The stuff I don't, I won't and no harm no foul.

But broadly, I agree that the streaming services should be paying substantially more.
 
I personally wouldn't subscribe to a music streaming service from my own pocket, but if I did, it'd be with one that paid artists more.
I myself use streaming (paid for) as a means to find new artists to listen too..and try to support by buying the physical media or maybe even go to a gig....so streaming..is also helping artists to be found, noticed and in the end exposure if they're good enough ..it's surely not all bad news for them...even though they might feel short changed on the streams....it's still a vehicle for them to promote their music and have a chance of being heard....that couldn't have been possible in the 60's, 70's, 80's,and the 90's....think about it.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts