Vladimir
New member
Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Why not?
Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Andrewjvt said:Vladimir said:Andrewjvt said:Which car should i buy... Moscovitch or Hindustan
You wouldnt warn him?
Moscovitch
Too
andyjm said:On the subject of the OP and his cables, just worth pointing out that there isn't a single post in this thread that makes any reference to the technical specification of the cables - which is the only thing that might make a difference.
You can draw your own conclusions from this.
Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Why not?
Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Why not?
In spite of what marketing may suggest expensive is not always better
Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Why not?
In spite of what marketing may suggest expensive is not always better
Hmm. Are you saying they can make stuff up? Surely not.
Gazzip said:andyjm said:On the subject of the OP and his cables, just worth pointing out that there isn't a single post in this thread that makes any reference to the technical specification of the cables - which is the only thing that might make a difference.
You can draw your own conclusions from this.
What should the OP conclude from this? That some people like to actually listen to hifi before making recommendations, whereas other people like to read about how it might work before dismissing it and then slagging it off?
Gazzip said:Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Why not?
In spite of what marketing may suggest expensive is not always better
Hmm. Are you saying they can make stuff up? Surely not.
Define better? I heard a system a couple of years ago that tore paint from the walls and very nearly burst my eyeballs. The guy who owned it had spent twenty years getting it to that point and absolutely loved it. Go figure...
Oldphrt said:Gazzip said:andyjm said:On the subject of the OP and his cables, just worth pointing out that there isn't a single post in this thread that makes any reference to the technical specification of the cables - which is the only thing that might make a difference.
You can draw your own conclusions from this.
What should the OP conclude from this? That some people like to actually listen to hifi before making recommendations, whereas other people like to read about how it might work before dismissing it and then slagging it off?
The only important thing you need to know is the resistance of it, which the foo manufacturers don't quote. You then select the cable with the lowest resistance. Both companies make impossible claims for mains leads, so that rules them out as far as honesty is concerned.
Vladimir said:Oldphrt said:Gazzip said:andyjm said:On the subject of the OP and his cables, just worth pointing out that there isn't a single post in this thread that makes any reference to the technical specification of the cables - which is the only thing that might make a difference.
You can draw your own conclusions from this.
What should the OP conclude from this? That some people like to actually listen to hifi before making recommendations, whereas other people like to read about how it might work before dismissing it and then slagging it off?
The only important thing you need to know is the resistance of it, which the foo manufacturers don't quote. You then select the cable with the lowest resistance. Both companies make impossible claims for mains leads, so that rules them out as far as honesty is concerned.
But what if the cable with higher resistance sounds better? What if two cables have same resistance but sound different?
Sounds like me ;-)Gazzip said:Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Gaz37 said:Vladimir said:Cheap cables = cheap sound
Expensive cables = more money but not necessarily better sound.
Why not?
In spite of what marketing may suggest expensive is not always better
Hmm. Are you saying they can make stuff up? Surely not.
Define better? I heard a system a couple of years ago that tore paint from the walls and very nearly burst my eyeballs. The guy who owned it had spent twenty years getting it to that point and absolutely loved it. Go figure...
[/i]Cheap Trick at Budokan is a live album released by Cheap Trick in 1978 and their best-selling recording. It was ranked number 426 in Rolling Stone magazine's list of "the 500 Greatest Albums of All Time". Cheap Trick found early success in Japan, and capitalized on this popularity by recording Cheap Trick at Budokan in Tokyo on April 28 and 30, 1978, with an audience of 12,000 screaming Japanese fans nearly drowning out the band at times.
nick8858 said:You need these....
http://www.nintronics.co.uk/Accessories/accessories-by-type/speaker-acce...
Seriously anyone who pays this sort of money needs some serious counselling. You can buy a house for that price up north. Utterly ridiculous
nick8858 said:
Hi,Gaz37 said:Genuine question, how do you "design" a speaker cable to sound how you want? It's a piece of wire with a plug on each end, that doesn't give you much to play with does it?
lindsayt said:Colin Wonfor was (AFAIK) the designer of Tellurium Q Blue.
Ask Colin.Gaz37 said:Genuine question, how do you "design" a speaker cable to sound how you want? It's a piece of wire with a plug on each end, that doesn't give you much to play with does it?