[quote user="al7478"][quote user="marcymarc555"]
[quote user="al7478"]interesting. i thought the harder highs would be something CA amps would be suited to (by their reputation - i have little experience of them)[/quote]
I think that the cambridge would sound lovely with opera music or something along those lines, but in my opinion it just doesnt seem to agree with rugged beats and the like.
I go round to a friends house quite often who has a 17 year old pioneer 400a and it sounds a million times better than the cambridge, it baffles me how something so old can sound better than something so new, but it just does, it pis*ses me right off lol
In all fairness though, i should of spent alot more money than what i did on an amp, £150 is nothing really in amp terms, thats probably why the old pioneer sounds so much better, because it cost more than £150 seventeen years ago i expect??l lol
Id like one of the new pioneer amps, but dont think the facia design agrees with other seperates.
[/quote]
i understand what you mean i think. it has difficulty coping with the thuddy stuff rather than the high end stuff...?[/quote]
Yeah thats kinda my point lol
I kind of get the feeling that the cambridge doesnt agree with poorly recorded music, when i say poor , i mean even stuff thats been studio recorded but through crap gear like it was in the old days.
New main stream music that has been engineered and produced to high standards through modern techniques is perfect for the cambridge,
Another way i see it is the cambridge trys to make crisp sound out of music that never had crisp sound in the first place lol