Hello. Im new to the forums but have listened to music for 30 years (or 60 if you cound both ears separatly ) Have read WHF for years but not registered on the forum so its my first post
Over here in Norway they both cost the same. I see that the mag has given both 5 stars. The cambridge seems abit more advanced and sturdy but that doesnt always translate into sound quality. I will match the amp with the b&w 686 or 685 depending on my budget but id like some input from those who has tested both amps. I may get a chanse at testing them both with said speakers but im not sure. I currently own the Cambridge 340A but fear that it may be abit on the weak side for the speakers i mentioned. I do like the sound quality it offers my old B&O RL1000 speakers.
Thank you
Over here in Norway they both cost the same. I see that the mag has given both 5 stars. The cambridge seems abit more advanced and sturdy but that doesnt always translate into sound quality. I will match the amp with the b&w 686 or 685 depending on my budget but id like some input from those who has tested both amps. I may get a chanse at testing them both with said speakers but im not sure. I currently own the Cambridge 340A but fear that it may be abit on the weak side for the speakers i mentioned. I do like the sound quality it offers my old B&O RL1000 speakers.
Thank you