Covenanter said:I see the "Linn wars" are still going 40+ years on.![]()
Chris
davedotco said:Covenanter said:I see the "Linn wars" are still going 40+ years on.![]()
Chris
And will continue to do so.
The reality was that, at the time it was introduced, the LP12 (whatever it's provenance) was a good player, available from a network of mostly compedent dealers at a price that people could afford.
It was not a well known brand in those days remember, it was sold primarily by demonstration, often against all comers. It saw off most of the competition quite comfortably, including the 'worlds biggest selling turntable' which sounded pretty poor in comparison. There were better players available, but either needed enthusiast owners or very deep pockets.
The dealer would set it up, often install and the result was an awful lot of very satisfied music enthusiasts. In the early days the marketing was pretty sound, the real bullsh!t came later
steve4232 said:Yes, I already know the Linn history, thanks, blah, blah, blah......................
So the LP12 is rubbish then?
This weekend I'm going to send my Lp12 to landfill in disgust. How dare it pretend to be an RD11!
davedotco said:I disagree, but then I usually do..... 😉
Speakers do certainly make the most difference, but do not confuse difference with improvement.
It is my view that many modern systems are unbalanced, too much speaker and not enough amplification.
To my ears this results is a lack of control, particularly at the bass end though it is sometimes noticeable across the rest of the range. Power is important but simple 'watts per channel' are not what you need. An amplifier that can deliver it's power into the difficult load thay many loudspeakers present is needed and this does not generally come cheap.
Inadequate amplifiers show in different ways, dynamic compression, lack of dynamic shading, bright highs, soft bass, common problems with many modern systems.
Better speakers are, naturally enough, more revealing both of the music and the quality of the amplifier driving them. There are no real rules but personally it would be a rare system that, for me, usefully spent more on the speakers than the amplifier.
TrevC said:davedotco said:I disagree, but then I usually do..... 😉
Speakers do certainly make the most difference, but do not confuse difference with improvement.
It is my view that many modern systems are unbalanced, too much speaker and not enough amplification.
To my ears this results is a lack of control, particularly at the bass end though it is sometimes noticeable across the rest of the range. Power is important but simple 'watts per channel' are not what you need. An amplifier that can deliver it's power into the difficult load thay many loudspeakers present is needed and this does not generally come cheap.
Inadequate amplifiers show in different ways, dynamic compression, lack of dynamic shading, bright highs, soft bass, common problems with many modern systems.
Better speakers are, naturally enough, more revealing both of the music and the quality of the amplifier driving them. There are no real rules but personally it would be a rare system that, for me, usefully spent more on the speakers than the amplifier.
I can buy a Behringer amplifier for £150 that exhibits all the desirable qualities that anyone could wish for in an amplifier at any price. High damping factor, low distortion, huge power and a doubling of the available power at 4 ohms compared with 8 ohm impedance loads. I could match this with speakers that cost thousands and the speakers would still remain the weakest link in the setup.
OK, so it looks like carp.
http://www.behringer.com/EN/Products/A500.aspx
Vladimir said:But you will be embarassed with your audiophile friends.
chebby said:steve4232 said:Yes, I already know the Linn history, thanks, blah, blah, blah......................
So the LP12 is rubbish then?
This weekend I'm going to send my Lp12 to landfill in disgust. How dare it pretend to be an RD11!
So you still don't understand that your cherished Source First hierarchy/philosophy of system building was inevitable from a company who only made a source and it was not some ultimate 'truth'?
TrevC said:davedotco said:I disagree, but then I usually do..... 😉
Speakers do certainly make the most difference, but do not confuse difference with improvement.
It is my view that many modern systems are unbalanced, too much speaker and not enough amplification.
To my ears this results is a lack of control, particularly at the bass end though it is sometimes noticeable across the rest of the range. Power is important but simple 'watts per channel' are not what you need. An amplifier that can deliver it's power into the difficult load thay many loudspeakers present is needed and this does not generally come cheap.
Inadequate amplifiers show in different ways, dynamic compression, lack of dynamic shading, bright highs, soft bass, common problems with many modern systems.
Better speakers are, naturally enough, more revealing both of the music and the quality of the amplifier driving them. There are no real rules but personally it would be a rare system that, for me, usefully spent more on the speakers than the amplifier.
I can buy a Behringer amplifier for £150 that exhibits all the desirable qualities that anyone could wish for in an amplifier at any price. High damping factor, low distortion, huge power and a doubling of the available power at 4 ohms compared with 8 ohm impedance loads. I could match this with speakers that cost thousands and the speakers would still remain the weakest link in the setup.
OK, so it looks like carp.
http://www.behringer.com/EN/Products/A500.aspx
Waxy said:I don't know about rules of thumb, but looking at my relatively new system, I see the following (assuming full retail paid, which it wasn't 🙂 )
Source: 37%
Amp: 38%
Speakers: 25%
I appreciate that this may be atypical!
Vladimir said:Hypothtical situation:
You have 3000 GBP and you enter a fairly large and well supplied hi-fi store. What do you go to listen to first? Speakers, amps, sources, cables or stands?
steve4232 said:I take it that not many of you agree with Linn's philosophy which was admittedly sneered at by the Hi-Fi cognescenti in the early 1970's but has (or so I thought anyway) subsequently become "the rule of hi-fi buying"?
The source is THE MOST IMPORTANT part of the chain, bar none! Forget speakers, they can only reproduce what they are given. Garbage in = garbage out. This has surely got to be the undeniable truth, no? I have upgraded my "front ends" far more than I have amps and speakers. Nothing has stood still in time. All source components develop over time: CD players, DVD players, Blu-Ray players. turntables, tape decks, streamers. The better the source component the better it will sound.
Whoever said spend x times the amount of the source on speakers needs to be taken out in public and subjected to non-stop Phil Collins albums all day! :rant: This is just plain daft and wasteful in my opinion.
Back in my student days I was told something similar by a shop assistant who sold me a pricey pair of B & W's. When I got home they sounded ok but didn't make my Hi-Fi sound any better overall. There was something missing: depth and detail. It all sounded very flat and lifeless, sterile. It was not until I got a half way decent CD player that everything pulled into focus and the system sounded much better.
After the source, the amps are key and then LASTLY THE SPEAKERS!
I had a dem the other day and the dealer was pretty clueless. I told him I had a high quality (although now vintage) pre/power amp combo and he kept bringing out integrated amps to put into a system to dem a source component. When I said the sound was naff compared to what I was used to, he kept getting better and better speakers out until I finally snapped and said, it's the AMP that's wrong, not the speakers. In fact, the speakers were already better than what I have currently but the system did not sound as good. Why, because of the amp. The closer the component is to the source the more key it becomes.
I'm certain the OP will follow his friends advice though irrespective of this as it seems to me that many people still believe this is the correct way to buy.
dfalir said:In other words you can not say that a 500GBP (5*) source a 500GBP (5*) amp, and a 2000GBP (5*) speakers will DEFINATELY sound better than if the source and the amp and the speakers are in the same price range. Again, assuming that for both combinations you have matched the components to you personal "ear" taste... 🙂
What do you think?
Vladimir said:Hypothtical situation:
You have 3000 GBP and you enter a fairly large and well supplied hi-fi store. What do you go to listen to first? Speakers, amps, sources, cables or stands?
davedotco said:Vladimir said:Hypothtical situation:
You have 3000 GBP and you enter a fairly large and well supplied hi-fi store. What do you go to listen to first? Speakers, amps, sources, cables or stands?
Hypothetical answer:
Go to a decent dealer and get him to play you systems that he knows works well at and around your budget.
If you hear a system you really like buy it, get the dealer to install and do not allow him to leave until you are happy.
CnoEvil said:eg. Valve or Solid State; Active or Passive; Class A or Class D;
Vladimir said:Hypothtical situation:
You have 3000 GBP and you enter a fairly large and well supplied hi-fi store. What do you go to listen to first? Speakers, amps, sources, cables or stands?
steve4232 said:If I put a £39 CD player through my pre/power amp combo, do you think it would sound any good? If I then spent £4000 on speakers, would it sound better? 'No' and 'no' are the answers that are truthful.
Exactly. I haven't given enough information for anyone to know if either (a) or (b) would be a good choice to make. It's all a big fat "it depends. It depends what exact amplifer and speakers I'm talking about. It's impossible to judge if a system will sound any good on the basis of how much the amp cost compared to the speakers. It's impossible to tell what a system will sound like based on the maximum power output of the amp, without further information.the record spot said:lindsayt said:Example (a) I'm thinking of buying an amplifier. It would cost about one quarter as much as my speakers. This amplifier can only provide a small fraction (4%) of the power my speakers can handle (24/7/365).
Will this amplifer be a good match for my speakers? Should I buy this amplifer or should I buy something else?
Example (b) I'm thinking of buying an amplifier. It will cost five times more than my speakers. It will provide more than sufficient power for my needs.
Will this amplifer be a good match for my speakers? Should I buy this amplifer or should I buy something else?
What solution is likely to get me the best sound? Example (a) or example (b)?
Depends on what else you need, how they sound and what you mean by "best ".