lindsayt
New member
dap33, here's a frequency repsonse chart as supplied by AVI of their ADM10 speakers.
I would urge some caution in interpreting this, as we have no vertical scale, we don't know what type of smoothing was applied and we don't know how truly representative they are. I personally would prefer to see independent measurements of these speakers from a reliable source, such as Stereophile.
I think it's a reasonable assumption to say that the vertical scale represents at least 1 db increments.
This model is supposed to have a fuller / better bass than their previous model ADM9's and ADM5's.
As anyone can see, the drop-off in the bass starts at 100hz. Not at 55hz. At 55hz they are already about 10 dbs down. That's a lot.
There's also a high chance that the bump that you see between 100 hz and 250 hz will be down to that being the area where port output exceeds cone output. A Stereophile type measurement would confirm this. The trouble with port output is the excessive amount of distortion you get with transients at the frequencies they are most active. This phenomenom is measurable with single cycle input tones and a microphone and oscilloscope.
I have not heard ADM10's yet. But I have heard ADM9's and they do sound as if they have similar frequency response to the one supplied for the ADM10's - especially in terms of the lack of bass extension. Which after all, is only to be expected when they are small ported 2 way speakers with small mid-bass cones.
dap33, there are some people that might enjoy listening to drum n bass and hip hop with the frequencies below 100hz progressively filtered out. I don't, due to that type of speaker taking so much of the fun, bounce, physical impact away from the music.