5 stars

[onlystyle]

in the my opinion site of the review of the anthem 700 i notice something that obviously is repeating himself

a memeber was demanding how a receiver who lacked features could receive 5 stars

why not for instance device stars as following

first star = build quality

second star = easy to set up

third star = video and cd quality converting

forth star = sonic performance home theatre and stereo (2.0)

fifth star = value for money

whats hifi could also decide to give half stars ..so the anthem could receive 4 1/2 stars due to his lack

stars could also be added

for exemple 6 star = future proof

why is this so important ? when you loock on the questions asked some are repeating themself

for example which receiver is good with music ??? it is the same with for exemple speakers packages

 

[onlystyle]

i know this item is not a great succes but the last time i hear more and more critisme about the waths hifi review

taken the two latest items

3 stars for the NAD t787 who is seen by all others sites has the best ever heard

and the blue ray oppo 103 who also reveived 3 stars there were a blue ray who has not got a analogue multi channel

output (marantz ud 7007) is getting 5 stars ..

when you are reading the reaction on this last one it should have cost him at least 1 star ...

i don't want to critisize the testers on WHifi but how does this come??