D
Deleted member 2457
Guest
So I found one of these for sale but don't have a particular good track record when it comes to buying second hand stuff, so I think not. Thoughts? Would've been paying around a £1000 for it.
Is it good, because I have lined up a deal? Cheers David.David@FrankHarvey said:One of our guys still uses one.
I am not really sure to be honest. Perhaps getting a different sound to see if I like it? I don't have a great track record with second stuff though. Ex-display or returned stuff great but never with second hand.Q5 said:Gel,
What are you trying to achieve.
You're only looking at ways to waste your money gel.gel said:I am not really sure to be honest. Perhaps getting a different sound to see if I like it? I don't have a great track record with second stuff though. Ex-display or returned stuff great but never with second hand.Q5 said:Gel,
What are you trying to achieve.
bigboss said:No gel, it's a very old AV receiver. Certainly not worth the price. You can get a flagship Marantz with all the bells and whistles for the money.
How different is it to LX81 which gel already has?ellisdj said:Gel should buy buzz's lx83 if he plans to sell it at any point.
That's a cracking amp, owned by legends of av
ellisdj said:Gel should buy buzz's lx83 if he plans to sell it at any point. That's a cracking amp, owned by legends of av
I think he is joking.bigboss said:How different is it to LX81 which gel already has?ellisdj said:Gel should buy buzz's lx83 if he plans to sell it at any point. That's a cracking amp, owned by legends of av
As long as you know that, it's fine.gel said:I think he is joking.bigboss said:How different is it to LX81 which gel already has?ellisdj said:Gel should buy buzz's lx83 if he plans to sell it at any point. That's a cracking amp, owned by legends of av
By those standards, the LX89 would be even better!ellisdj said:The 83 was supposed to be significantly better than the 82 which will better the 81.
The one I owned is now cherished by another enthusiast
To my knowledge the 81 was it's hey day with the Sc-lx90 too and the Pioneer bdp-lx91 Blu Ray player and the TVs still, went down hill from there on. Blu Ray players ****, amps more expensive, no TVs. Still not recovered and never will now.ellisdj said:Not necessarily the 83 was pioneers hey day - the 85 was no better when I demo'd it and they have long lost the av receiver crown that was in cement when 82 - 85 range was out.
I do like the fact the newer models use sabre dacs though,
gel said:To my knowledge the 81 was it's hey day with the Sc-lx90 too and the Pioneer bdp-lx91 Blu Ray player and the TVs still, went down hill from there on. Blu Ray players ****, amps more expensive, no TVs. Still not recovered and never will now.ellisdj said:Not necessarily the 83 was pioneers hey day - the 85 was no better when I demo'd it and they have long lost the av receiver crown that was in cement when 82 - 85 range was out.
I do like the fact the newer models use sabre dacs though,
buzz_lightclick said:Imagine how good their TVs would be now if they had kept making them!
spiny norman said:buzz_lightclick said:Imagine how good their TVs would be now if they had kept making them!
The amount they were apparently losing on the TVs, they would probably have been long out of business by now.
buzz_lightclick said:Hence it was a hypothetical, "what if?" type of question.
spiny norman said:buzz_lightclick said:Hence it was a hypothetical, "what if?" type of question.
It wasn't a question at all.