Would a HiFi setup sound better than a home cinema setup for music?

R2D2

Well-known member
Apr 17, 2024
564
209
1,270
I have always listened to music through a home cinema setup and it’s my main way to listen to music but was thinking what’s the advantages and what to people prefer to listen to music to out of the two? For example would be the quality of this speaker setup against a home cinema setup:


Thanks
 
Last edited:
Hi, you have similar dilema as I had some 20-25 years back. Finaly I have sold my 5.1 HT Setup and used only HiFi 2 channel system since for listening to music. To make long story short, 2 channel is optimized for listening to stereo recordings, which are still standard. One remark to your system proposal: B&W 603 tower louspeakers are very good speakers, but very demanding on used electronic. If your room has 25m² and more, they will deserve more autoritative amplifire than Arcam Radia 5. Arcam Radia 15 or even 25 will have better control over B&W 603 or Rega Elex mk4 as well. And than look for really good talented music source. If you wish we can give you some recomendations. BR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
For me the biggest factor is budget.

You are gonna get more bang for your buck (better quality components) when buying Hifi Vs Home Cinema. (The following is a generalisation):

Hifi - Source / Amp / 2 Speakers (plus cables)

Home Cinema - Source / Receiver / 5 speakers plus Sub (plus cables).

So yes, for a specific budget, you would get a better stereo sound buying a dedicated stereo system. However, the way I look at it is that a very good Home Cinema set up can perform very well for stereo. A very good Stereo set up (therefore lacking rear speakers), cannot perform as well for home cinema.

At the moment I am fortunate enough to be able to run 2 separate systems. If I had to choose one, it would be the Home Cinema (for reasons stated above).
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2 and Al ears
I have, in the past, been fortunate enough to run two systems however due to lack of work have had to disassemble my home theatre bundle to sell and replaced with a decent soundbar.
Excellent Quad speaker assemblage soon to go on the market.
Hifi setup has also been changed but still in place fortunately.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
I have always listened to music through a home cinema setup and it’s my main way to listen to music but was thinking what’s the advantages and what to people prefer to listen to music to out of the two? For example would be the quality of this speaker setup against a home cinema setup:

Thanks
Quality wise, the amplifier doesn't know whether the music is from a film soundtrack or CD. It will amplify it to the same quality. The same goes for the stereo speakers. If you were starting from scratch and only going to listen in stereo, then it would be cheaper to get a two channel amp and two speakers, rather than 5/6 amps and 5/6 speakers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2 and Al ears
I have been listening to my setup in stereo this past hour and I do think I am missing something. I think it’s 2 floorstanding speakers, which would you recommend for my setup? Must go with my pioneer amp. I am thinking of I would be better of just starting again actually getting 2 floorstanding speakers, CD player and amp. Why are floorstanding speakers so expensive at the moment?

I don’t think I would have a problem choosing a CD player but the amp I would and speakers unless I can get some ex-display ones.

I think with my home cinema system I am better of by using Blu-ray music discs with DTS Master Audio and Dolby True High definition rather than playing stereo music on my system. Perhaps I should look for some more Blu-ray music live concerts rather than going the stereo route.
 
Last edited:
Hi, you have similar dilema as I had some 20-25 years back. Finaly I have sold my 5.1 HT Setup and used only HiFi 2 channel system since for listening to music. To make long story short, 2 channel is optimized for listening to stereo recordings, which are still standard. One remark to your system proposal: B&W 603 tower louspeakers are very good speakers, but very demanding on used electronic. If your room has 25m² and more, they will deserve more autoritative amplifire than Arcam Radia 5. Arcam Radia 15 or even 25 will have better control over B&W 603 or Rega Elex mk4 as well. And than look for really good talented music source. If you wish we can give you some recomendations. BR.
Could I have some recommendations for these speakers please?

 
2:1 system dedicated to stereo reproduction will nearly always sound better than an AV 5:1 receiver setup.

This is largely due to the latter having multi layers of electronics that are designed to be compatible with various sound and video formats. Stereo amps have a more direct circuitry and therefore, the reproduction of stereo is more faithful to the sound.

Not always the case, many reputable AV receivers can bypass the circuitry to give a more pure stereo sound. The Denon and Marantz models try to give you the best of both worlds. This explains their popularity among Hifi enthusiasts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
Ran an Onkyo TX-NR818 into just two channels for a few years, initially as a main amp, but later as just a preamp when I first ventured into actives.

Worked a treat, sounded great. As good as a regular stereo integrated? Yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
As you can run whatever speakers you want for the fronts/stereo pair, the quality of amplification is the main differentiator. An AV amp has many more channels built in as well as lots more inputs, video and audio processing etc. Ergo if both are equally good, the stereo amp should have an advantage as you'll be spending your given budget on a smaller number of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al ears and R2D2
As you can run whatever speakers you want for the fronts/stereo pair, the quality of amplification is the main differentiator. An AV amp has many more channels built in as well as lots more inputs, video and audio processing etc. Ergo if both are equally good, the stereo amp should have an advantage as you'll be spending your given budget on a smaller number of things.
My thinking exactly
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
I always imagined that speakers were like musical instruments, so the argument is can you tell the difference between a £500 one to a £5000 one.
I suppose I have £600 speakers left and right and I think and so does my dad they sound better than his £1800 floorstanding speakers. Not to mention I have a sub too not that my dad doesn’t. And these speakers are 18 years old and not including the recent price hikes I see on floorstanding speakers such as B&W ones.

I reckon I should demo some because I have only heard a couple of floorstanding speakers, so couldn’t really tell you either way would I notice a difference between a £500 one to a £5000 one, not that I can afford a £5000 one. 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jasonovich
As you can run whatever speakers you want for the fronts/stereo pair, the quality of amplification is the main differentiator. An AV amp has many more channels built in as well as lots more inputs, video and audio processing etc. Ergo if both are equally good, the stereo amp should have an advantage as you'll be spending your given budget on a smaller number of things.
Ok, cool. Thanks, makes sense that was along my kind of thinking too. Which amp would you recommend for £1500 pair of floorstanding speakers? Thanks
 
Ok, cool. Thanks, makes sense that was along my kind of thinking too. Which amp would you recommend for £1500 pair of floorstanding speakers? Thanks
Tricky, much will depend on what you want to use for a source.
Do you need a phono stage for example, do you need an inbuilt DAC?
I wouldn't spend good money on an amp that had stuff I didn't need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
Tricky, much will depend on what you want to use for a source.
Do you need a phono stage for example, do you need an inbuilt DAC?
I wouldn't spend good money on an amp that had stuff I didn't need.
I was kind of thinking the amp would do Bluetooth and I listen to it that way with the floorstanding speakers. I don’t want phono stage but a inbuilt DAC would be good.

See these 2 deals:



Ex-display or nearly new for this will more than do. So inbuilt DAC amp with Bluetooth too for speakers like the ones above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jasonovich
I was kind of thinking the amp would do Bluetooth and I listen to it that way with the floorstanding speakers. I don’t want phono stage but a inbuilt DAC would be good.

See these 2 deals:



Ex-display or nearly new for this will more than do. So inbuilt DAC amp with Bluetooth too for speakers like the ones above.

I believe the Monitor Audio are the same as mine that I'm using in my lounge AV setup.

Really nice piano finish, quality speakers. Long and thin, less footprint. Loved the sound from those, clean neutral sounding, good on detail and less on warmth but it all depends on the amp.

Not difficult to drive and these floor standers are cat proof, because they're thin, cats will avoid jumping on them!

1752575000438.png


Oh BTW, I'm using Dali F9 subwoofers (front firing) with the MA's, these work well together. 🙂
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2
I was kind of thinking the amp would do Bluetooth and I listen to it that way with the floorstanding speakers. I don’t want phono stage but a inbuilt DAC would be good.

See these 2 deals:



Ex-display or nearly new for this will more than do. So inbuilt DAC amp with Bluetooth too for speakers like the ones above.
If your only using Bluetooth you might be compromising the ability of the system.
If so any decent amp with inbuilt dac would do as you can always add a cheap Bluetooth receiver to it.
That said if you are transmitting from something via Bluetooth surely it has already been through a DAC?
Or am I missing something here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2 and Jasonovich
If your only using Bluetooth you might be compromising the ability of the system.
If so any decent amp with inbuilt dac would do as you can always add a cheap Bluetooth receiver to it.
That said if you are transmitting from something via Bluetooth surely it has already been through a DAC?
Or am I missing something here?
I am complete novice here, so was looking for guidance as to what you need or not.
 
Floor standing speakers need a reasonably large room (As well as a sub) for them to give there best, so make sure your room is big enough before going down that route.
A stereo amp will usually give a better sound than an AV Receiver for the same price due to the fact that better components can be used (As mentioned in a post above), however once you go higher end (Anthem, Arcam, JBL, Marantz, Lyngdorf etc.) the differences are minimal, as the law of diminishing returns kicks in.

Bill
 
  • Like
Reactions: R2D2

TRENDING THREADS