MajorFubar
New member
I didn't intend to flame or insult, and if I came across that way, then sorry.
But the HiFi scene is so full of snake-oil it's untrue, and anyone who comes along and shouts "the emperor is naked" is called narrow-minded and has set agendas. Perhaps I'm being unfair because I have no experience of Linn's or other manufacturer's forums, but my possibly wrong opinion is that a manufacturer's forum is probably the last place I'd head if I wanted to steer clear of marketing bull**** dressed-up as pseudo-science.
Digital is not like analogue. It's quantifiable, measurable and exact. Bits are bits and bytes are bytes. Perhaps an engineer can explain in easy-to-understand language how the stream of bits have been corrupted/compromised on their way to the DAC purely because they've been extracted from a losslessly-compressed file which potentially put slightly extra strain on the processor. But until then I'll carry on using ALAC, happy in the knowledge that I have proved in my own tests that FLAC/ALAC uncompress to recreate the WAV with such absolute accuracy that the two waveforms mathematically cancel each other out when you invert one file's phase. But in the meantime, one thing I won't accept is someone hinting that if I can't hear the difference then it's just because my HiFi's rubbish.
But the HiFi scene is so full of snake-oil it's untrue, and anyone who comes along and shouts "the emperor is naked" is called narrow-minded and has set agendas. Perhaps I'm being unfair because I have no experience of Linn's or other manufacturer's forums, but my possibly wrong opinion is that a manufacturer's forum is probably the last place I'd head if I wanted to steer clear of marketing bull**** dressed-up as pseudo-science.
Digital is not like analogue. It's quantifiable, measurable and exact. Bits are bits and bytes are bytes. Perhaps an engineer can explain in easy-to-understand language how the stream of bits have been corrupted/compromised on their way to the DAC purely because they've been extracted from a losslessly-compressed file which potentially put slightly extra strain on the processor. But until then I'll carry on using ALAC, happy in the knowledge that I have proved in my own tests that FLAC/ALAC uncompress to recreate the WAV with such absolute accuracy that the two waveforms mathematically cancel each other out when you invert one file's phase. But in the meantime, one thing I won't accept is someone hinting that if I can't hear the difference then it's just because my HiFi's rubbish.