its something ive been wondering about , im not looking to change any of my kit as im very happy with it all ..
im just wondering which of the two components is the more important in achieving the best sound quality ?
im assuming a cd player is going to have the least impact in a hifi seperates system ?
if so , whats the more important piece of the puzzle ?
for an example , ive got the marantz 6003 amp and rx6 speakers , both great for me ..
now say i wanted to spend a grand (its hypothetical guys , i have to use something as an example)..
a leema pulse ? stick with the rx6s ?
a pair of spendor a5s , with the marantz ?
or imagine a fella had a pair of spender a5s and a pulse , and wanted a grands worth of extra performance , does he upgrade the speakers or the amp ?
my instinct is that many people never get to reap maximum performance from their speakers , rather than matching them with an amp that can get the best out of them they tend to change speakers first , any views ???
im just wondering which of the two components is the more important in achieving the best sound quality ?
im assuming a cd player is going to have the least impact in a hifi seperates system ?
if so , whats the more important piece of the puzzle ?
for an example , ive got the marantz 6003 amp and rx6 speakers , both great for me ..
now say i wanted to spend a grand (its hypothetical guys , i have to use something as an example)..
a leema pulse ? stick with the rx6s ?
a pair of spendor a5s , with the marantz ?
or imagine a fella had a pair of spender a5s and a pulse , and wanted a grands worth of extra performance , does he upgrade the speakers or the amp ?
my instinct is that many people never get to reap maximum performance from their speakers , rather than matching them with an amp that can get the best out of them they tend to change speakers first , any views ???