Pretty shameful stuff, isn't it?Currently watching 'A Cruel Love: The Ruth Ellis Story'
No doubt she was a gold digger, but the courts never asked her essential questions, such as where did she get the gun. Also how did she outside the Magdaler pub so quickly? All these questions should have been an automatic part of her defence. Also, the beatings she received from David Blakeley, incl losing an unborn baby.
Currently watching 'A Cruel Love: The Ruth Ellis Story'
No doubt she was a gold digger, but the courts never asked her essential questions, such as where did she get the gun. Also how did she outside the Magdaler pub so quickly? All these questions should have been an automatic part of her defence. Also, the beatings she received from David Blakeley, incl losing an unborn baby.
This is why we must never bring back the death penalty.Pretty shameful stuff, isn't it?
Agreed.This is why we must never bring back the death penalty.
Yep, it's beyond belief they didn't ask basic questions.Pretty shameful stuff, isn't it?
I suggest we just agree to disagree and leave it at that and, not fall out over something we can't influence.Without getting too far into the death penalty debate.....I think for a certain category of person, exceptions should be made.
Let's say, for hypothetical purposes, that a random person is happy to murder three young girls at a Taylor Swift dance event.
Or, hypothetically again of course let's say, somebody (and/or his brother) thinks it's a good idea to wipe out 22 lives at an Ariana Grande concert.....oh and for good measure, seriously, permanently injure some prison guards after devising ways to deliberately do so.
Now let's imagine said persons show absolutely no remorse.
In fact they joyfully celebrate their actions.
THERE IS NO MISTAKING WHAT THEY'VE DONE let's be clear about that.
Throw in the killer of dear old David Amess and I don't know (or frankly, care) about anyone else, but I for one would gladly see the death penalty in 3 such cases at least.
Where there is a situation of deminishing responsibility or death by extreme provocation or homicide in domestic settings, gang warfare or robbery, I think Corporate Punishment shouldn't apply.Without getting too far into the death penalty debate.....I think for a certain category of person, exceptions should be made.
Let's say, for hypothetical purposes, that a random person is happy to murder three young girls at a Taylor Swift dance event.
Or, hypothetically again of course let's say, somebody (and/or his brother) thinks it's a good idea to wipe out 22 lives at an Ariana Grande concert.....oh and for good measure, seriously, permanently injure some prison guards after devising ways to deliberately do so.
Now let's imagine said persons show absolutely no remorse.
In fact they joyfully celebrate their actions.
THERE IS NO MISTAKING WHAT THEY'VE DONE let's be clear about that.
Throw in the killer of dear old David Amess and I don't know (or frankly, care) about anyone else, but I for one would gladly see the death penalty in 3 such cases at least.
No you can't, the death penalty for treason was ended in 1998. Go ahead call him big ears!🤣Ps.
Did you know you can still be hanged for TREASON.
So pleased don't call HM Charlie big ears!
Learn something everyday 😜👍No you can't, the death penalty for treason was ended in 1998. Go ahead call him big ears!🤣