Movie - total waste of celluloid. So much CGI I wonder why they bothered using any real actors at all. Plot resembled the book about as far as the end of the title went, then departed at 90 degrees.
Anyway, that's not the point.
The 3D effects were impressive, I would even go as far as to say they were whelming (not overwhelming, just whelming) in their effect. However, I found the whole thing gimmicky and the movie used to demonstrate the gimmick rather than to add anything to the movie. I would put it as far as to say the screenplay and cinematography (sp) were designed to show off the 3D, rather than the 3D being used to enhance the movie. Moreover, the 3D often seemed forced rather than natural, being too3D in its effect.
If this is what we can expect from 3D movies, and thus the 3D content of our 3DTV, I'll be happy with good old 2D. Sorry and all that, but that's my opinion and I'll have to be pushed hard to change my mind in the foreseeable.
Anyway, that's not the point.
The 3D effects were impressive, I would even go as far as to say they were whelming (not overwhelming, just whelming) in their effect. However, I found the whole thing gimmicky and the movie used to demonstrate the gimmick rather than to add anything to the movie. I would put it as far as to say the screenplay and cinematography (sp) were designed to show off the 3D, rather than the 3D being used to enhance the movie. Moreover, the 3D often seemed forced rather than natural, being too3D in its effect.
If this is what we can expect from 3D movies, and thus the 3D content of our 3DTV, I'll be happy with good old 2D. Sorry and all that, but that's my opinion and I'll have to be pushed hard to change my mind in the foreseeable.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram