It appears to be a matter of popular opinion that the PS3 is the best Blu-ray player. If it didn't have the ability to play PS3 games, then we suspect that popular opinion would be different. For those of us not interested in games, then the PS3 would be considered as a Blu-ray player along with all the standalone players. We did consider a PS3, but having auditioned it alongside players from Panasonic, Pioneer, Sharp, Sony and Samsung. It was a process of elimination for us. Panasonic and Pioneer, albeit with some minor 'A' modifications, were still their first generation players. As there had been a shortage of Panasonic BD10/As, it appears curious that they didn't stop production and release the Profile 1.1 BD30 worldwide. Both the Sharp and Sony (S300) players have been build to a price and reviews appear to reflect this as there are better players out there. The Samsung BD-P1400 hasn't been reviewed as yet, but I'd be very surprised if it didn't get Five Star rating for it picture and sound quality. As it has an ethernet port, then firmware upgrades are a doddle - we actually used a DVD-R for the upgrade (a facility that should be available to all BD/HD players)? Who actually needs the ethernet for this particular function? The DVD-R route only took 15 mins total.
A lot is made of the HD (and BD Profile 1.1) function of picture in picture and extra content downloadable via internet. We think it's good to have extras with DVD/BD/HDs, but there becomes a time when there could be too many. We'd much rather have all the content on one disc. BD has a clear advantage here with a 50GB working capacity.
How long will it be until the studios will start to charge for 'downloadable extras'?
The most important issue for most people, when upgrading to HiDef, be it Sky, cable, BD, HD or whatever is the picture and sound quality. There is a novelty value of some of the periferal facilities, but once that has worn off, are the basics up to scratch?
From our point of view, the Samsung BD-P1400 meets all those objectives. It has has fabulous picture and sound. It plays all discs with no problems and it plays all the extras faultlessly too! Firmware updates are a dobble. As an upscaling DVD player (to 1080p) it's good, maybe not a match for our Pioneer DV-600AV, but if someone has never seen upscaled DVDs before, then I'm sure it would be more than adequate for most!? As a CD player, it's OK, again the DV-600AV is better. Contrary to the manual and publicity, it DOES play DVD-Audio discs. Our Sony RDR-HXD710 DVD recorder also plays DVD-Audio discs when it's not supposed to!
As I wrote before, although we are in the BD camp firstly, we would have no problems getting an HD player too.
History does repeat itself. Remembering the Betamax/VHS war. There are some comparisons. Sony lost that war because it didn't have the support of the rest of the hardware industry. Maybe Samsung and LG have produced dual format players, but they are in essence BD players with HD added on. All the other majors are supporting BD. Given it's close ties with Toshiba, it's not really surprising Onkyo has and HD player out. I'm sure the hardware manufacturers are in constant 'development' talks with the studios. It wouldn't surprise me if Warner Brothers decision on their future bias is being discussed with the likes of Panasonic, Sony, Pioneer, Sharp, Philips, Denon, Yamaha, Marantz, JVC, Hitachi etc. Their decision could well be based on what hardware those companies are going to release next year. If they have all got sub $400 / £200 players (or less) lined up, then that's pretty well it for HD, I'm sorry to say.
Anyone wonder why Microsoft doesn't put an HD drive as standard in the XBox360? They've probably already got an add-on BD drive lined up for the inevitable!?
P.S. I'm most certainly not anti-Microsoft.
Although it may well have been Sony's arrogance in not incorporating HDi (it chose Java) for BD (to unify one HiDef 5in disc format), as time has passed, it appears that Microsoft has backed the wrong side this time around - only they can explain the real reason - we can only speculate! Downloading songs is one thing, but 50GB of films, that's pure fantasy!