- Aug 10, 2019
- 2,556
- 4
- 0
I have recently spent a lot of time reading these (and other) forums in the hope of settling on a new TV. I now am familiar with the idea that plasmas have the edge for movies and motion, give a more realistic picture and certainly seem to have less discussed faults that the LCD. I also know well that 'factory settings' are designed for the retail environment and that plasmas in shops often are not shown to their optimum capacities.
Well my research led me to a Panasonic plasma (via a flirtation with some version of a Sony Bravia). But despite all the reviews I have read, despite all the received wisdom of many who know better than I when I saw the 42 Panny beside the Bravia the latter was not only brighter and more vibrant (expected) but also clearer and sharper and had more detail. And both were apparantly displaying a Blu-Ray feed.
My point is that do I trust my own eyes or the research. If the latter it is taking an awful lot on trust. So what do I go with research or my own eyes. Its also a matter of convincing a sceptical 'better half' that the TV which looks the best of the two is not!
Can anyone comment on this dilenmma?
Thank you
JoJo
Well my research led me to a Panasonic plasma (via a flirtation with some version of a Sony Bravia). But despite all the reviews I have read, despite all the received wisdom of many who know better than I when I saw the 42 Panny beside the Bravia the latter was not only brighter and more vibrant (expected) but also clearer and sharper and had more detail. And both were apparantly displaying a Blu-Ray feed.
My point is that do I trust my own eyes or the research. If the latter it is taking an awful lot on trust. So what do I go with research or my own eyes. Its also a matter of convincing a sceptical 'better half' that the TV which looks the best of the two is not!
Can anyone comment on this dilenmma?
Thank you
JoJo