I rang Amazon this morning, and tried to organise a price match with play.com, but they weren't interested - so I'm returning it to them and losing the postage. I have to say, I did some tests before making that call, and I'm beginning to wonder what the deal is here - BBC HD on Freesat is excellent on my TV - it fills the screen, so using the 1080 pixel count, and is obviously far superior to SD - but DVD, wether its 1080 being downscaled to fit the widescreen i2.35:1 nto the frame, or 576 being upscaled to exactly the same size, don't seem to be much different in the real world. And as far as the two free HD DVD's were concerned, 300 was grainy as hell, apparently intended, but not exactly a demo disc, and Bourne wasn't much better.
I decided that even at £77, this whole HighDef thing is totally over hyped when applied to DVDs.
So what is the true story - WhatHifi say its brilliant, and yet still show pictures of teles in their reviews with full screen video, which never happens in real life - no one ever mentions the fact that you lose nearly a quarter of the pixels to a black top and bottom in widescreen, and can it really be right that the DVD player upscales, to then have the TV downscale, or upscale again - to fit in its version of a screen? and then finally, those 2 DVDs were supposedly 1080p - so when I put the TV into exact scan mode, and there were still the black bits top and bottom, it would seem to indicate that the actual film bit of the DVD is only 740'ish pixels high anyway, so why say its 1080 - the whole thing to me is one huge bunch of confusion and marketing hype - please someone lay the truth on the table and explain the whole thing so as I can understand it - please!