I have enjoyed reading everyones analyses of the film. On Wednesday night I started mentally analysing the film, but I never realised about the Freudian interpretation, until I read SFCs comments.
After my first viewing I thought that maybe the common thread was the changes in the characters lives. Then I read a review that said that the common thread was about acceptance:
1 - the man finally accepts that he has killed his wife
2 - the ad executive finally accepts that her ad ideas are crap
3 - the lad finally accepts that his father will always be a bird
4 - the one burglers acceptance that he is gay
But this gave no explanation regarding Vinnie Jones - he has changed, but what has he accepted? The only thing that I could think of was that someone could have no function in life.
I also have some questions about the filmcraft:
1 - After both viewings, I had the unanswered question - why did the man want to murder such a beautiful wife in the first place? Does anyone else think that it would have helped the film, to have a short introductory section explaining the murder (maybe them having a row, or whatever)?
2 - I could never understand why we needed to see the dancing rabbit in the hypnotism show - I do not think that the rabbit added anything to the film.
3 - Why did the ad executive need to have her moment of realisation that her ideas were crap, in such a sudden manner? If felt as though it was a forced sudden ending, because the budget had run out, or the director knew that the film was too long, or the writer had run out of ideas. All the other characters were allowed a gradual realisation of acceptance.
4 - I don't understand the closing portion with the murdered being flown around by the birdman. Is it an analogy for the murderer has committed suicide, and is being flown to heaven?
5 - I was puzzled by the schoolgirls in the cafe, talking about being injured by birds - what was that about?
6 - I also wondered if the murderer was intended to be the anti-hero, but that left the question about why then kill him at the end of the film.
Sorry that there are more questions here, than answers, but hopefully it will help continue the discussion.