plastic penguin
Well-known member
chebby said:Started at the request of Richard42 to keep discussion of this new product seperate from the 'Active speakers club' thread.
(Shakes head )
chebby said:Started at the request of Richard42 to keep discussion of this new product seperate from the 'Active speakers club' thread.
Andy-F73 said:I am an owner of a pair of ADM 9.1T's with the corresponding sub and I am both happy with the product and happy in which the way AVI conduct it's business.
It's fair to say that this company divides opinion and that's dissapointing, I bet if everyone met for a beer things could be quite different.
For me the ADM approach is one that should be applauded for it's technical excellence.
char_lotte said:. I've sold the pair of Adm's I had as I despise the way this company do "business".
char_lotte said:Funnily enough I'm listening to Talk Talks "Laughing Stock" at the moment. Which seems quite apt.
Andy-F73 said:For me the ADM approach is one that should be applauded for it's technical excellence.
John Duncan said:Andy-F73 said:For me the ADM approach is one that should be applauded for it's technical excellence.
I agree. What I do not agree with is the suggestion from the manufacturer that they are the last remaining bastion of such excellence, or that this - and I say this having listened to the 9.1something (I lose track) as well as many, many other systems - translates into undeniable audio superiority, and that anyone who disagrees with this view is deaf, stupid or an industry stooge.
John Duncan said:char_lotte said:I've sold the pair of Adm's I had as I despise the way this company do "business".
Probably best do that now since second hand values are going to plummet, what with the 5s being better than anything else in the range apart from the RSSs. Or actually better than them. Or not better than them. And when you switch from the ADM40s you don't notice the difference. Until you go back to the ADM40s, which are of course better. So in other words they're as good as the third-string model in the range, but are still 1,000 times better than all others in the world. And they don't need bass because there is no bass in real music (except when there is, in which case there's a sub for that - just not these ones).
Andy-F73 said:John Duncan said:Andy-F73 said:For me the ADM approach is one that should be applauded for it's technical excellence.
I agree. What I do not agree with is the suggestion from the manufacturer that they are the last remaining bastion of such excellence, or that this - and I say this having listened to the 9.1something (I lose track) as well as many, many other systems - translates into undeniable audio superiority, and that anyone who disagrees with this view is deaf, stupid or an industry stooge.
Perhaps a truce is in order: let's all respect each others opinion and just enjoy what we each have.
fr0g said:char_lotte said:. I've sold the pair of Adm's I had as I despise the way this company do "business".
If I did that for every company that I thought conducted its business in an unethical way I'd be sat in a field with no clothes on.
Although I do excercise that choice with a few brands...such as Apple and to a lesser extent, Amazon.
I try to buy products that haven't been tested on animals or have come through sweatshops and near-slave labour.
But you have chosen to avoid a company because of a couple of loudmouths. Well done. You lose the internet.
John Duncan said:Andy-F73 said:John Duncan said:Andy-F73 said:For me the ADM approach is one that should be applauded for it's technical excellence.
I agree. What I do not agree with is the suggestion from the manufacturer that they are the last remaining bastion of such excellence, or that this - and I say this having listened to the 9.1something (I lose track) as well as many, many other systems - translates into undeniable audio superiority, and that anyone who disagrees with this view is deaf, stupid or an industry stooge.
Perhaps a truce is in order: let's all respect each others opinion and just enjoy what we each have.
I do. It seems to be others who do not enjoy what I have, for some strange reason.
plastic penguin said:chebby said:Started at the request of Richard42 to keep discussion of this new product seperate from the 'Active speakers club' thread.
(Shakes head )
drummerman said:... even though it will inevitably lead to a fruit.
chebby said:drummerman said:... even though it will inevitably lead to a fruit.
Yep, you can always rely on Altruistic Lemon.
drummerman said:These ADM5's could end up as a speaker with a small identity crisis but thats merely a speculation.
There is clearly very vocal interest over at HDD but already there are folks which wonder how exactly they will use them and equally important, what with.
I hope thats not going to an issue and clear guidance from the manufacturers would probably be good even though it will inevitably lead to a fruit.
regards
drummerman said:chebby said:drummerman said:... even though it will inevitably lead to a fruit.
Yep, you can always rely on Altruistic Lemon.
JD on form today. Whatever you had for breakfast ...
regards
Edit; Just noticed it was you chebby, apologies
chebby said:plastic penguin said:chebby said:Started at the request of Richard42 to keep discussion of this new product seperate from the 'Active speakers club' thread.
(Shakes head )
Shake away PP. I happened to agree that the 'active speaker club' has been a pretty civilised and bi-partisan thread so far and thought it a good idea to divert the inevitable ### storm ( that a new AVI product would cause) to a separate place.
richardw42 said:PP. Youve completely misunderstood.
It was to clear the crap from the active speakers thread. Chebby could just as easily called this the BS thread.
Andy-F73 said:Perhaps a truce is in order: let's all respect each others opinion and just enjoy what we each have.