Not wrong.
Sorry, but lending is not covered by any 'fair use' clause.
Fair use can be applied to the purchaser.
I was talking specifically about lending.
From the earliest vinyl, through CDs there has always been the copyright warning that precludes 'unathorised lending'.
And they don't mean the lender can authorise the lending 🙂.
Of course, it's one of the most broken laws that there has ever been.....even if you don't do it 😉
There are 3 core rights granted to the copyright holder. One of them is 'the right of distribution'.
It establishes the right to distribute copies or phonorecords of a copyrighted
work
to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.
The intent of this law is not to stop people from lending purchased copyrighted work to a friend or family member.
It is intended to prevent us from lending purchased copyrighted work to the 'public'.
e.g: you 'lend' one of your CD's to your friend who is the landlord of your local pub and he/she plays it on their jukebox while the premises are open to the public. This would be in violation of the law.
The purchaser of the copyrighted material is allowed to make a reasonable number of copies of the copyrighted material for their own use (but NOT for distribution to the public).
Lending material to a friend (which is legal) who then makes a copy for themselves (for their own personal use) is technically a violation of the copyright laws, but it's a somewhat grey area. The copyright holder may want to prosecute but would have to go before a judge who would make the decision based on the circumstances.
Here's another example:
You purchase a piece of sheet music and then lend it to a friend who then makes a photocopy of it for their own use before they return it to you. It could be a grey area but you may not be aware that they made a copy and so no judge could really prosecute.
However, if this friend is say, a school teacher, who makes 50 copies and takes it to his/her school and distributes it to the school orchestra to play, that would be in violation of the law.