Al ears
Moderator
I have no idea as to why, in the right system they make excellent front ends for the moneyI know. I mentioned MAs.
Fact is MAs tend to be looked at as inferior by many so-called purists. Far from it in the right system.
I have no idea as to why, in the right system they make excellent front ends for the moneyI know. I mentioned MAs.
Fact is MAs tend to be looked at as inferior by many so-called purists. Far from it in the right system.
They also make cracking multi channel speakers.I have no idea as to why, in the right system they make excellent front ends for the money
Indeed, which always makes me think there’s an inherent flaw or weakness in their design. Once we go down the path of creating compensating errors it doesn’t often end well ime.There seems to be a number of Triangle owner who struggle to find the right amplification.
Concur.Indeed, which always makes me think there’s an inherent flaw or weakness in their design. Once we go down the path of creating compensating errors it doesn’t often end well ime.
With apologies to those who love their Triangles!
No issues with the Triangles. I just find it almost as revealing as the Proac D2's I used to have. That in itself is a compliment.Concur.
There must be those who have no issues with Triangles. You can obviously compensate or manipulate how a component can present itself, but it is somewhat limited.
Based on what amplifier?No issues with the Triangles. I just find it almost as revealing as the Proac D2's I used to have. That in itself is a compliment.
I went through Atoll, Plinius, then ended up with the Naim Supernait 2 when using D2's. The Plinius was by far the best match of the lot and the most transparent, too. The Triangle showed the Cyrus to be energetic and spunky. Audiolab 6000A sounded pacey and punchy. It's been fun trying different configurations with the gear I've bought.Based on what amplifier?
Perhaps that's where the Triangles Achilles heel is: way too open and transparent.
As you don't have an issue, that's great.
However, I would suggest a Cyrus and Triangles are probably not the best combo.
There's a world of difference between excitement (instant impact) and something you can live long-term with.
Judging from your signature and what newworld uses with his Triangle Borea BR03, Triangle speakers, the Borea and Espirit lines at least, need amplifiers with a certain kind of signature. It was with a Naim Nait 5si that the Espirit Titus EZ did not sound convincing. If the amplifier has a velvety sound like Class A amps, then you get too much of a good thing.The Esprit Titus speakers definitely don't "round things off", in fact the tweeter does the opposite. If a speaker rounded things off, it was my previous speakers the Elac debut b5 (first version), which were very laid back sounding. Great speakers apart from that. The other description about Triangles being delicate is more apt as so much can be picked up in the mix with these speakers and yes, when someone said above every tweak in a system is revealed in the speaker, this is definitely true.
The DAC in the Audiolab 6000A introduces some colororation in the sound since it is not isolated in any way from the rest of the amplifier. My Cambridge Audio CXA80 does the same thing with its USB input, it adds a "zing" to the sound. With the Atoll DAC100SE though ... it would be unfair to make comparisons but there is no "zing" and that takes out some of the "liveness".One thing about the Audiolab 6000A is that amplification itself is really nothing out of ordinary. I think it's the DAC section that determines the character of its sound. It got me thinking, perhaps DAC is just supposed to be another form of equalization. All that jitter and purity of signal talk might just be marketing jargon.
I remember that very Naim-Triangle setup used to be recommended by whathifi and was curious to hear the pair. The 5si has rolled off highs and generous bottom end which is the opposite of these speakers. Maybe the thinking was to offset to achieve balance? That way of approach has never worked for me.Judging from your signature and what newworld uses with his Triangle Borea BR03, Triangle speakers, the Borea and Espirit lines at least, need amplifiers with a certain kind of signature. It was with a Naim Nait 5si that the Espirit Titus EZ did not sound convincing. If the amplifier has a velvety sound like Class A amps, then you get too much of a good thing.
Maybe it was on purpose? An effort to sabotage the French invasion?I remember that very Naim-Triangle setup used to be recommended by whathifi and was curious to hear the pair. The 5si has rolled off highs and generous bottom end which is the opposite of these speakers. Maybe the thinking was to offset to achieve balance? That way of approach has never worked for me.
Your conclusion for the best VFM combo is?I went through Atoll, Plinius, then ended up with the Naim Supernait 2 when using D2's. The Plinius was by far the best match of the lot and the most transparent, too. The Triangle showed the Cyrus to be energetic and spunky. Audiolab 6000A sounded pacey and punchy. It's been fun trying different configurations with the gear I've bought.
I'm definitely not one of them. Me getting an Arcam is really just fooling around and wanting to see how good my little Denon is. For my tastes and in my set up, I think it beats the A29. Need to hear more, haven't been able to do any listening for a couple of days.There seems to be a number of Triangle owner who struggle to find the right amplification.
Not a fan at all. It sounded flat and unengaging, but I didn't have Triangle speakers at the time.Audiolab 6000A
As a former long-term Arcam owner, if you're not familiar with brand it can take a while to fully appreciate it's talents.I'm definitely not one of them. Me getting an Arcam is really just fooling around and wanting to see how good my little Denon is. For my tastes and in my set up, I think it beats the A29. Need to hear more, haven't been able to do any listening for a couple of days.
At the price I paid for? Cyrus-Triangle by far.Your conclusion for the best VFM combo is?
I can see why you would think the 6000A is flat and uninvolving. It's tonally very even from top to bottom with a dollop of pace, making it a great measuring stick.Not a fan at all. It sounded flat and unengaging, but I didn't have Triangle speakers at the time.
It's a figurative speech, but fair enough. Its musical involvement is a good standard other equipment can be compared to.I don't want a measuring stick - I want a sound that moves me and involves me in the music. I have a bit of a problem when people go on about equipment that measures well. Of course measurement is important but we're talking about music reproduction not hospital cat scanners!