Oh well.
I never got the hype or love for the A400 either.On another note, I had the Pioneer A400 for a while. Rather overrated I felt. Used it with a pile of gear but for an amp that turned up at - what - £250? It was okay. For the 1990s when it came out though, it probably seemed like a revelation. Overly bright and quite thin-sounding across the board I found and not quite deserving of the fanfares it subsequently received.
IMO obvs!
Only because you recommended it to everyone who was inquiring about amplifiers being stocked by other retailers.And yet some members have subsequently bought RA-1062's.
It’s a good amp, one I’d prefer over an A400.Nothing much wrong with the 1062, my brother currently has mine.....
I would concur and I have owned bothIt’s a good amp, one I’d prefer over an A400.
That's true. But if someone says they've heard it and wasn't that impressed, I don't keep on going back to try and convince people. The Record_spot said more than once he wasn't overly impressed with A400Just about the same as everyone else on this forum.......
Can I mention a Leema Pulse?
However, I seem to recall this post was about speakers....
Funnily enough, that's exactly what I thought.
So, we have 'A is better than B' and 'B is better than A', so all we need now is 'all amplifiers sound the same'!
Only because you recommended it to everyone who was inquiring about amplifiers being stocked by other retailers.
It’s a good amp, one I’d prefer over an A400.
Doesn’t really mean anything. Manufacturers always pitch their designs against the popular amplifiers at the time.And yet Rotel and B&W used the A-400 as a reference to design the RA-1062.
So you duped all those people into buying a lesser amplifier instead of the “better” A400?! Have you no shame!Btw, as good as the the RA-1062 is however it still hasn't got the performance potential of the A-400.
Out of interest what components have you used the A-400 with please?
Hopefully.......and that's the end of that chapter
How are you getting on with the GB1i?Nahhhh don't worry - knock yourselves out. In any case I'm going to start another thread that might annoy a few people
Unfortunately most threads appear to annoy someone in the forum.Nahhhh don't worry - knock yourselves out. In any case I'm going to start another thread that might annoy a few people
Only the ones that begin with the word 'So', annoy me 🤬Unfortunately most threads appear to annoy someone in the forum.
Doesn’t really mean anything. Manufacturers always pitch their designs against the popular amplifiers at the time.
So you duped all those people into buying a lesser amplifier instead of the “better” A400?! Have you no shame!
I know which one I’d still buy…
Subjectivity rules.
Are you deluded?Joker. But then again its to be expected from a shameful supply merchant.
Zero is the extent of your knowledge regarding the development of the RA-1062.
I'll recommend a product when I believe and feel is suitable to do so. For eg. the RA-1062 is superior to a NAD C370. However I haven't always recommended the RA-1062 over the C370 because the RA-1062 just like the A-400 and almost all if not all products is/are not going to be the ideal fit in every system.
Btw, If you feel I have no shame in me recommending for eg. basic 'freebie' interconnects then so be it.
If you feel that I have no shame in me actually selling the cheaper RA-1062 while you were busy supplying the more expensive and highly reviewed A85 (a reminder that I never sold a single A85 btw) then so be it.
If you feel I have no shame in recommending products from brands that we don't deal with the so be it.
Anyway, after all these years glad to see your appreciation of the RA-1062 come to the fore.
Subjectivity rules? Yeah right. Only when it suits your agenda.