The_Lhc said:Surely the level of channel separation is entirely down to the recording mix? So this may help some recordings but ruin others? You might as well listen in mono if you're going to go down this sort of route?
busb said:What Jim is suggesting makes perfect sense - particularly for headphone listening where there's little natural Xtalk. I've often listened to non-acoustic music where part of the mix only gets fed to one channel for short periods. Through headphones, the effect can be quite unpleasant for the opposite ear, especially if there's no ambient sounds to fill the void. With speakers, there's enough Xtalk to mask the unpleasant effect to some degree.
Thompsonuxb said:I don't doubt that.... :rofl:
But the sound any amp produces requires a 'speaker' and with regrad realism and channel seperation positioning and distance of the speakers have real impact more than anything an amp maker can engineer into their amp.
Give us the link ......
Thompsonuxb said:Hmmmm, I have not read the article but from what you've just said I can't see anyone taking it seriously.
Thompsonuxb said:busb said:What Jim is suggesting makes perfect sense - particularly for headphone listening where there's little natural Xtalk. I've often listened to non-acoustic music where part of the mix only gets fed to one channel for short periods. Through headphones, the effect can be quite unpleasant for the opposite ear, especially if there's no ambient sounds to fill the void. With speakers, there's enough Xtalk to mask the unpleasant effect to some degree.
I'm not a big user of earphones, so not sure what you mean by the above regards the mix, in older recordings, when technology was not so great and the majority of the band came out of one channel and the vocalist the other is this the sort of thing we are talking about, to reduce the one or the othetr side type stereo?