his dudeness said:
the samsung suhd tvs seem to be brilliant but they will not produce the blacks of oled,lg have a prototype hdr oled at ces.
It's worth reading Mark Hogkinson's piece on High Dymanic Range technology, available at: https://www.avforums.com/article/what-is-a-hdr-4k-tv-ces-2015.11039
Mark points out that:
"[OLED is] not currently able to hit the luminance levels demanded by HDR. We believe the new crop of LG OLEDs can hit around 500 nits - so half the requirement - but [it’s] possible LG can find a way of obtaining 1000 cd/m2 in the future."
To my knowledge, LG is intergrating QD and HDR on its LED models, but LG's OLED displays cannot achieve required luminance to fully implement HDR.
If this was as easy as observing that HDR only relates to brightness levels the discussion would be simple, because a TV displaying a static white field at 1,000 cd/m2 would be unbearably bright. If you work through the article, however, the situation is a little more complicated.
At the same time, I take your point about OLED native black level.
Given the choice, I'd take a 4K OLED TV with passive 3D over a 4K LED model with QD and HDR.
I may be among a small minority of consumers who feel this way, however, and I can imgaine people buying into "X times brighter" marketing rhetoric.