jcbrum said:
Technology advances in driver designs have made big advances. Particularly in the reduction of distortion. AVI are noted for pursuing the advantages of leading edge designs in driver technology.
By now, literally thousands of users have made their choice by purchasing, and attesting to the excellence and realism of AVI speakers. To suggest that this is the opinion of a few 'paid shills', is ridiculous.
JC
Are AVI noted for "pursuing the advantages of leading edge designs in driver technology?" If they are, it would be unfair not to mention Sonus Faber, Harbeth, Spendor and others who have drivers built or adapted to their designs, generally by companies such as Scanspeak or SEAS. Then there's B&O, who make their own speakers from the amp upwards, and who are pioneers in amp design - think ICE technology. Let's also not forget ATC KEF and B&W, who make and continually improve their own drivers. If you look outside the UK there's Canton in Germany and Focal in France who have huge R&D departments. Last of all there's the driver manufacturers themselves, in particular scanspeak and SEAS, who again spend a lot of time and money in R&D. There's many more I've not listed, but you get the gist. I mean, if buying a Scanspeak tweeter means "pursuing the advantages of leading edge design, then I'm in there, too, because I use Scanspeak tweeters in my designs. What I don't do, and neither does AVI, is to contribute to those advances in any way.
I'd also point out literally tens of thousands of users have made their choice and have bought B&W, Spendor, Sonus Faber, Focal, Canton etc etc attesting to the excellence and realism of those speakers. Of course, the fact someone buys a certain speaker may have nothing to do excellence or realism, so essentially that's a non sequitor.
Why are you so on-eyed in this matter, JCB? Is it friendship, or do you really believe there are no better speakers than AVI in the world?