Naim merges with Focal

Clare Newsome

New member
Jun 4, 2007
1,657
0
0
Visit site
in case you missed it, here's today's hi-fi industry news - overview here, with full Q&A here.

Very strong quote from the newly formed co-company: "For future success, the key point is that there is no future for a speaker or electronic company alone"....
 
Although they say they are keeping each companies identity in terms of sound, looks and badging, it would be interesting to know whether each of the companies are prepared to promote the each others when it comes to system building? If so, what influence that'll have on their individual sound.

We know that Marantz and Mordaunt Short have a similar arrangement, likewise Rotel and B&W... some combos work a treat, while others don't neccesarily click.
 
That's interesting. So it's definitely not an April Fools prank?

Nevertheless, would be worthwhile to know this. From a strictly business angle, I can see the logic behind Naim and Focal merger; at some point down the line they will need to address the fact that not many (at this stage) recommends Focal speakers with Naims.
 

Andrew Everard

New member
May 30, 2007
1,878
2
0
Visit site
plastic penguin said:
That's interesting. So it's definitely not an April Fools prank?

No, It's August.

plastic penguin said:
Nevertheless, would be worthwhile to know this. From a strictly business angle, I can see the logic behind Naim and Focal merger; at some point down the line they will need to address the fact that not many (at this stage) recommends Focal speakers with Naims.

Why, if the two companies are to be run entirely independently?

Anyway, all this is addressed in the Q&A.
 

BenLaw

Well-known member
Nov 21, 2010
475
7
18,895
Visit site
Thanks for the Q&A Clare. Not entirely sure I get it. Possible advantages: economies of scale? But they're making a big thing of keeping the businesses separate in every way possible. Better, harmonised distribution? Seems to be the best reason, but they still say retailers can / will remain as they are. Shared R & D? To an extent, but again this is being kept separate. Focal moving into electronics? Possibly, except they say they're just about to release a couple of products, which presumably Naim had no input with.

Any ideas?
 
Andrew Everard said:
plastic penguin said:
That's interesting. So it's definitely not an April Fools prank?

No, It's August.

plastic penguin said:
Nevertheless, would be worthwhile to know this. From a strictly business angle, I can see the logic behind Naim and Focal merger; at some point down the line they will need to address the fact that not many (at this stage) recommends Focal speakers with Naims.

Why, if the two companies are to be run entirely independently?

Anyway, all this is addressed in the Q&A.

Doesn't matter if the two are run independently: If they have a vested interest and merge, albeit on a R&D basis, if someone phones Naim and asks for a recommendation for a large standmounter, can't really see them pointing in any direction other than Focal.

Many moons ago, when I worked in the stationary business, the company I worked for merged with Chapman envelopes. They were separate companies, Chapmans having the lion share of that particular market...

If we were out of stock of our top of the range envelope we were told by the management to sell Chapman's equivilent. And vice versa. We were acting as independent agents though.

Do Focal make amplifiers?
 

Clare Newsome

New member
Jun 4, 2007
1,657
0
0
Visit site
BenLaw said:
Thanks for the Q&A Clare. Not entirely sure I get it. Possible advantages: economies of scale? But they're making a big thing of keeping the businesses separate in every way possible. Better, harmonised distribution? Seems to be the best reason, but they still say retailers can / will remain as they are. Shared R & D? To an extent, but again this is being kept separate. Focal moving into electronics? Possibly, except they say they're just about to release a couple of products, which presumably Naim had no input with.

Any ideas?

From further discussions, the R&D aspect seems key. Rather than both companies exploring new-tech areas separately, they can work jointly.

And yes, i'm sure It will also translate into economies of scale for raw materials, components etc: they'll get a better price buying as a joint force.

Plus it seems - as the Q&A hints at - the distribution/retail/event-collaboration elements will be key in the future.

Then there are all the little logistical details that could have benefit - eg access to marketing databases; Focal able to promote Naim Label/downloads etc etc
 

Clare Newsome

New member
Jun 4, 2007
1,657
0
0
Visit site
noogle said:
Whatever the Q&A says it would seem bonkers for Naim to develop a new speaker range beyond Ovator.

Time will tell....

Meanwhile, it's worth remembering that -for example - Denon and Marantz are part of the same company, yet both produce (competing) Blu-ray players, AV receivers and hi-fi systems.
 

matthewpiano

Well-known member
Consolidation is the way of the world now and will continue to be so. It has already happened massively in the car industry and has been largely very successful - VW Group as an example of how to take-over other brands and make them work successfully whilst combining resources and Renault-Nissan Alliance as an example of how a merger between two brands can bring together the difference strenghts of each (Nissan using Renault's diesel engines and Renault learning more about efficiency and reliability from Nissan, for example).

We've also seen it happen in the hi-fi retail sector - Practical Hi-Fi, Audio Excellence, Audio T, and Sevenoaks Sound & Vision have now merged (through two seperate mergers) into the one brand.

The point with Naim and Focal is that both make very high quality products. Whether we'll start to see lots of Naim/Focal systems being recommended only time will tell, but if the merger can open new marketing avenues for the two brands and enable them to share costs in at least some of their R&D activity it can only benefit both brands.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Altho I haven't heard the combination, I can't imagine these two having synergy together - I'd suspect they would be any exciting listen but on the edgy/bright/agressive side - anyone familiar with this? Admittedly I don't have a high opinion of Naim (too dry & flat - prat over musicality). But then B&W were co-marketed with Classe and they weren't the best combination when I tried them (I wonder if Abbey Road studio tried any other combinations)
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
13
0
Visit site
BenLaw said:
Thanks for the Q&A Clare. Not entirely sure I get it. Possible advantages: economies of scale? But they're making a big thing of keeping the businesses separate in every way possible. Better, harmonised distribution? Seems to be the best reason, but they still say retailers can / will remain as they are. Shared R & D? To an extent, but again this is being kept separate. Focal moving into electronics? Possibly, except they say they're just about to release a couple of products, which presumably Naim had no input with.

Any ideas?

This is a good point, as the major synergistic benefits usually arise when everything is combined, saving any duplication of costs.

If they keep their seperate R&D depts, the only gain will be where the Companys' technologies overlap (not sure how big this will be). Of course, joining forces may make money easier to borrow!
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts