In what way is it a game changer? have you heard it?jaxwired said:Love to read a review of this amp. I think it's a game changer...
So would I. On paper it looks immense with a very extensive list of goodies for the price. Is a review in the pipeline?jaxwired said:Love to read a review of this amp. I think it's a game changer...
That's the point I was trying to make, and others insisted it was just another class D amp (was it you Jax?jaxwired said:I've heard the NAD M2 which uses the same "direct digital" technology. The simplified signal path for digital sources means the lowest noise level ever achieved. The sound is pristine and amazing. The M2 and the C390 are a completely new breed of amplifier and nothing else like them exists. They are not "just another class D amplifier".
Nope, I never said that. I've been a fan since the M2 first came out 2 years ago. I posted this pic on another thread so people can understand. This pic should make it obvious how NAD has changed things.manicm said:That's the point I was trying to make, and others insisted it was just another class D amp (was it you Jax?jaxwired said:I've heard the NAD M2 which uses the same "direct digital" technology. The simplified signal path for digital sources means the lowest noise level ever achieved. The sound is pristine and amazing. The M2 and the C390 are a completely new breed of amplifier and nothing else like them exists. They are not "just another class D amplifier".). NAD states the amps keep the signal completely digital until it's about to hit the speaker. And indeed with the C390 at least you cannot add analogue sources as standard - they'll sell a slot-in module for them but again it will convert to digital and pass along the amp's normal signal path!
Not true - Sharp released the SM-SX100 in 2000, and Yamaha released their MX-D1 in 2005.krolikgena said:Lyngdorf Tdai2200 true digital amplifier / Millenium.. they were even before M2
so Nad is far from game changer...
Look forward to your thoughts!Andrew Everard said:A review sample has been requested – quite apart from the WHF review, I'm keen to have a play with it for Gramophone in the near future
ahkrolikgena said:What exactly is not true? first Millenium came out in 1998 and was world's first true digital amplifier.
When do you think you will do the Gramophone review?Andrew Everard said:A review sample has been requested – quite apart from the WHF review, I'm keen to have a play with it for Gramophone in the near future
You see, I think that is a good thing. I like the NAD look and I actually much prefer the look of my 326 to the Marantz 6004 design. I like the looks of the new C390DD and if I had that sort of money I'd audition it in a flash.the record spot said:And somehow, NAD still managed to make the damn thing look like a NAD...
Nice! What speakers/sources you using?prutten said:I am already convinced - after extensive listening decided this was an amplifier which offered not only a big sound with no coloration whatsoever and brought great transparency to the most difficult pieces of music on which I have heard other major equipment stumble. Therefore it now has a place of honor in my living room ;-) But I would still be really curious to see if WHF shares this experience. For those who can't wait for the WHF review, there is a good review in Dutch: http://issuu.com/lenbrookint/docs/hifidelityreview_nadc390dd Google translate can help you probably but I think on the NAD website there is a partly translated version.
I agree completely. I just bought an M2 replacing my Bryston amp and preamp. My benchmark DAC is now pulling headphone duty only. The sound is astonishing.lordgrace said:Anyone know if it is on dem anywhere in London? The more I look at the specs the more I think that this is the one! I have no interest in surround sound or vinyl, what I want is an all in one solution that will give me fantastic quality for all my digital stereo sources.![]()
Nice video. I love the man cave!jaxwired said:I agree completely. I just bought an M2 replacing my Bryston amp and preamp. My benchmark DAC is now pulling headphone duty only. The sound is astonishing.lordgrace said:Anyone know if it is on dem anywhere in London? The more I look at the specs the more I think that this is the one! I have no interest in surround sound or vinyl, what I want is an all in one solution that will give me fantastic quality for all my digital stereo sources.![]()
If interested: Video Here
You're right. I'm gonna post a different song. I think I can find something better...Ajani said:Nice video. I love the man cave!jaxwired said:I agree completely. I just bought an M2 replacing my Bryston amp and preamp. My benchmark DAC is now pulling headphone duty only. The sound is astonishing.lordgrace said:Anyone know if it is on dem anywhere in London? The more I look at the specs the more I think that this is the one! I have no interest in surround sound or vinyl, what I want is an all in one solution that will give me fantastic quality for all my digital stereo sources.![]()
If interested: Video Here
Not sure why you have 2 dislikes and no likes on the vid. I'll have to correct that.
EDIT: I suspect the swearing in the song is the reason for the dislikes. It just sneaks up on you.
Different strokes eh Matthew! Unfortunately, I think they've managed to make a pig's ear out of a silk purse. I'll take the Marantz anyday, lol!matthewpiano said:You see, I think that is a good thing. I like the NAD look and I actually much prefer the look of my 326 to the Marantz 6004 design. I like the looks of the new C390DD and if I had that sort of money I'd audition it in a flash.the record spot said:And somehow, NAD still managed to make the damn thing look like a NAD...