hey, all,
I'm educating myself on what's on the market and many people recommend the Marantz tt-15s1 as the best of the best in the 2000$ range. what I don't get is when it is compared to a turntable from the Rega lineup why it is always compared to the P3 or the P6 when the Planar 8 (with Ania cartridge) is priced much closer to the Marantz tt-15s1 (a little lower even) and performs considerably better than the P3/6.
so I wonder...
is it that the Planar 8 is so much better than the the Marantz tt-15s1 that it is considered part of another league entirely and no one thinks to compare the two?
or
is it that in the around 2000$ range the Marantz tt-15s1 is unmatched and the Planar 8 doesn't give that much bang for the buck whereas the Planar 6 does and that's why it gets honorable mentions in reviews?
all opinions welcomed, thank you!
I'm educating myself on what's on the market and many people recommend the Marantz tt-15s1 as the best of the best in the 2000$ range. what I don't get is when it is compared to a turntable from the Rega lineup why it is always compared to the P3 or the P6 when the Planar 8 (with Ania cartridge) is priced much closer to the Marantz tt-15s1 (a little lower even) and performs considerably better than the P3/6.
so I wonder...
is it that the Planar 8 is so much better than the the Marantz tt-15s1 that it is considered part of another league entirely and no one thinks to compare the two?
or
is it that in the around 2000$ range the Marantz tt-15s1 is unmatched and the Planar 8 doesn't give that much bang for the buck whereas the Planar 6 does and that's why it gets honorable mentions in reviews?
all opinions welcomed, thank you!