http://www.ebacoustics.com

[The_Lhc]

jules153:Also, tho I realise you print the dimensions on the website, I think you should show a photo giving an impression of how big/small each speaker is. Perhaps show them side-by-side. You don't want people sending back pairs of EB2s saying 'I didn't realise how big they were going to be...'

I think that's a general point really, the photos in magazines don't give any clue as to scale, I was astonished by the size of some of the standmounters at the Bristol Show!

 

[Anonymous]

chebby:

Perhaps - as a manufacturer - diplomacy might be preventing you from pointing out that the ATC SCM11s cost about £285 more than the EB2s!

(SCM11s are £956 according to at least three dealers from the ATC dealer list that publish prices)

At these prices (£669 for EB2 and £956 for SCM11s) £285 is a significant sum.

Not diplomacy Chebby, Respect!.

 

[drummerman]

I guess this is another way of getting a bit of free advertising ... keeping a thread alive indefinitively. Done in a nice way.

 

[Anonymous]

drummerman:

I guess this is another way of getting a bit of free advertising ... keeping a thread alive indefinitively. Done in a nice way.

Wasn't intended that way. Drummerman has raised an issue though.

This thread was originally started by yann2 as regards the EB website. Website resolved, yann2 has got his speakers and seems happy, thread has been off-topic now for ages. MODERATORS!. Maybe the time has come to kill this thread and delete it as EB2 has threads of it's own. Thoughts???.

 

[John Duncan]

Well if you'd stop replying to it...

 

[Andrew Everard]

...it would just slip down the latest posts list into oblivion...

 

[chebby]

Don't worry about it.

You have a new product that not only won 5 stars on it's debut, but consolidated those 5 stars by "taking the strengths of the ATCs and raising the bar" (WHF's words) in a head-to-head with the SCM11.

Also it was feedback invited from WHF forum members that influenced your choice of a closed-box design for the EB2.

Why not 'bask' for a bit? (Whilst building EB2s of course)

How about the WHF pair going to A. Everard esq. at Gramophone magazine to get the classical angle on these speakers? (And eventual posterity in their 85 year online archive.)

.

 

[Andrew Everard]

chebby:How about the WHF pair going to A. Everard esq. at Gramophone magazine to get the classical angle on these speakers? (And eventual posterity in their 85 year online archive.)

I think you'll find I'm way ahead of you there...

 

[John Duncan]

Does this mean they'll eventually end up in somebody's boot and then my house?

 

[Andrew Everard]

JohnDuncan:Does this mean they'll eventually end up in somebody's boot and then my house?

Why not? Everything else seems to be doing so at the moment...

 

[chebby]

JohnDuncan:Does this mean they'll eventually end up in somebody's boot and then my house?

If someone has a big enough boot.

 

[John Duncan]

chebby:
JohnDuncan:Does this mean they'll eventually end up in somebody's boot and then my house?

If someone has a big enough boot.

 

[Andrew Everard]

chebby:If someone has a big enough boot.

 

[John Duncan]

Let's call that one a draw...

 

[Andrew Everard]

Score-draw, though...

 

[cse]

Are the EB2's Bi-wireable?

 

[Andrew Everard]

According to the tech specs provided by our review team, yes.