chebby said:
CJSF said:
altruistic.lemon said:
To get the best out of the Dyna you maybe need a better arm and deck. The Ortofon is working within the limitations of your equipment, the Dyna is being limited by that.
. . . . :? ??????
I understand alt.lemon's point perfectly.
It is about achieving the best balance or (grits teeth) 'synergy'. In other (better) words; a 'whole' that is better than the sum of it's parts.
Caterham cars make one or two versions of their minimalist sports cars that can beat quite a few very expensive supercars around a track for a small fraction of a supercar price. They do this with quite small and quite humble Ford engines that are little different to those found in average family saloons.
You are doing the equivalent (with your Rega) of trying to jam a huge Aston Martin engine into a Caterham and it is frustrating you why some £500 cartridges (2M Black and the Dynavector) are still being outperformed (in some important regards) by your 'humble' Ortofon 2M Blue.
To solve this problem you are considering putting an even more exotic cartridge ('engine') into the P5 rather than enjoying one that mostly works to your turntable's strengths and doesn't emphasise it's weaknesses too much.
That makes sense Chebby . . . The problem with the Ortofons, they are dry, the Black is analytical and dry, the Blue just erring towards dry. You will note in post #12, I mention the 'Grado Platinum 1' as the dark horse in the pack? . . . By all accounts its not dry, its smooth and musical, gentle in the top, a bit of a charmer . . . :? Using the car analogy, I'd rather ride in an Aston Martin than a Ferrari . . .
Certainly the Blue, despite its rough edges, is the best cartridge apart from being on the cool (dry) side, it saw off the Sumiko, on a £ for £ basis.
However, shoe horn jobs can be successfully don to good advantage, as I said, I was a racer in a previous life and achieved very notable success with a bit of thought and sideways thinking, no budget, leave the opposition standing, because I though sideways about the problems, got my sideways hat on at this moment. Same in the 80's, achieving an acknowledged, 'almost' universal mass damping system, that, to that point, was deemed unworkable by the biggest names in the industry.
Just had a thought, I applied my sideways thinking to damping the ISO GT2 sub platter as it works now . . . same as the 80's we used to extract performance, especially at the base frequency end, from the most unlikely stand mounted speakers . . . :O
So its powder dry, watch this space . . . in the meantime, enjoy your music . . . CJSF