Hi
This is my first post in this forum though i have browsed here plenty of times before for advice.
Basically, I have recently moved into a place where I can finally realise my dream of having 5.1 surround sound for movies. However, I have also been putting off getting a new set of hi-fi separates for some time because I had never previously had a room good enough to make the most of a decent hi-fi system. Now that I'm in a position to be able to get a new hi-fi and surround sound system I can't afford to buy both at the standard I would like - at least not yet.
I think I will buy the surround sound system first as it can at least play stereo music and vice versa is obviously not possible.
I'm looking at getting the Monitor Audio RX6 AV12 speaker package as I don't have much space for speakers behind the couch but the rear speakers in this package can be placed to the side thanks to the diffusive dipole setting. To keep me ticking over until I can afford a new hi-fi system I want to make sure the AV receiver I buy will also be reasonable for music. I understand most AV receivers won't produce hi-fi quality to the standard of a stereo amplifier of the same price point but I am willing to compromise for a while (and it should still be better than the separates i've had for 8 years now).
I'm looking to spend up to about £1500 on the AVR and was looking at the Marantz SR7005 as an option as I have heard from some reviews that this is good for music, though others have claimed it could be better. Is this a good choice and do you know of any decent alternatives?
For playing CDs (my primary source of music) I was also wondering whether I would get away with using the new Marantz Blu-ray player the UD7006 (i could also then stream lossless from my itunes) and whether this would be a good match for the SR7005 for stereo? Would I be better off buying something like the Marantz CD6003 (only £250) to feed into the SR7005 for playing cds? Obviously I could use the CD6003 + the PM6003 and use speaker switches for the front RX6s but would this £250 stereo amplifier be better than the stereo channel in the £1300 AV receiver (with a pure direct mode) and make the most of the RX6s?
Sorry for all the questions but this seems to be a difficult thing to answer from any previous threads I have found. Any help you can provide will be much appreciated.
(In case it matters i mainly listen to Metal music so detail, clarity and instrument separation is important and i'm not a bass-head - the bass guitar and double-kick drums need to be tight, precise and have impact without being bloated or or over-whelming the guitars and vocals)
Stu
This is my first post in this forum though i have browsed here plenty of times before for advice.
Basically, I have recently moved into a place where I can finally realise my dream of having 5.1 surround sound for movies. However, I have also been putting off getting a new set of hi-fi separates for some time because I had never previously had a room good enough to make the most of a decent hi-fi system. Now that I'm in a position to be able to get a new hi-fi and surround sound system I can't afford to buy both at the standard I would like - at least not yet.
I think I will buy the surround sound system first as it can at least play stereo music and vice versa is obviously not possible.
I'm looking at getting the Monitor Audio RX6 AV12 speaker package as I don't have much space for speakers behind the couch but the rear speakers in this package can be placed to the side thanks to the diffusive dipole setting. To keep me ticking over until I can afford a new hi-fi system I want to make sure the AV receiver I buy will also be reasonable for music. I understand most AV receivers won't produce hi-fi quality to the standard of a stereo amplifier of the same price point but I am willing to compromise for a while (and it should still be better than the separates i've had for 8 years now).
I'm looking to spend up to about £1500 on the AVR and was looking at the Marantz SR7005 as an option as I have heard from some reviews that this is good for music, though others have claimed it could be better. Is this a good choice and do you know of any decent alternatives?
For playing CDs (my primary source of music) I was also wondering whether I would get away with using the new Marantz Blu-ray player the UD7006 (i could also then stream lossless from my itunes) and whether this would be a good match for the SR7005 for stereo? Would I be better off buying something like the Marantz CD6003 (only £250) to feed into the SR7005 for playing cds? Obviously I could use the CD6003 + the PM6003 and use speaker switches for the front RX6s but would this £250 stereo amplifier be better than the stereo channel in the £1300 AV receiver (with a pure direct mode) and make the most of the RX6s?
Sorry for all the questions but this seems to be a difficult thing to answer from any previous threads I have found. Any help you can provide will be much appreciated.
(In case it matters i mainly listen to Metal music so detail, clarity and instrument separation is important and i'm not a bass-head - the bass guitar and double-kick drums need to be tight, precise and have impact without being bloated or or over-whelming the guitars and vocals)
Stu