as topic ... i just wondering which version will sound better ?
would be for headphone stereo use only
would be for headphone stereo use only
6th.replicant said:AFAIK, 96/24s and SACDs are, in effect, the same resolution and many of the 'new' 88-96/24 DLs are sourced from existing SACD master tapes, as HDtracks.com clarified recently when it released the hi-res versions of the Rolling Stones back catalogue.
FWIW, I prefer SACDs purely because my CDP does a better job of playing digital music compared to my computer/iTunes/DAC setup.
CnoEvil said:6th.replicant said:AFAIK, 96/24s and SACDs are, in effect, the same resolution and many of the 'new' 88-96/24 DLs are sourced from existing SACD master tapes, as HDtracks.com clarified recently when it released the hi-res versions of the Rolling Stones back catalogue.
FWIW, I prefer SACDs purely because my CDP does a better job of playing digital music compared to my computer/iTunes/DAC setup.
That is also my understanding. SACD/DVD Audio.. really come into their own in 5.1 (fantastic - shame its dying.) I hope Blu-ray music takes hold....but it too will probably remain niche. Cno
TALON1973 said:i should add .. when i got into sacd abit originally i had a VERY good 5.1 system ......times change ... and sacd playback would be through sony s370 br player ...
nearly all my listening these days is through headphones ... senn hd600 , graham slee solo , mf v-dac through pc ... if i went sacd route obvoiusly the path is slightly different....
so.... teh 96/24 download is ok i take it ? it is from hdtracks
also i have a slight concern on how long i can expect teh quality of my downloads to last ? and if i can re-download at no cost to me in the future ? anyone know ?
TALON1973 said:i should add .. when i got into sacd abit originally i had a VERY good 5.1 system ......times change ... and sacd playback would be through sony s370 br player ...
nearly all my listening these days is through headphones ... senn hd600 , graham slee solo , mf v-dac through pc ... if i went sacd route obvoiusly the path is slightly different....
so.... teh 96/24 download is ok i take it ? it is from hdtracks
6th .. have you got a link to that info please ?
Sorry, are you saying you're expecting the quality of a digital file to degrade over time? Nothing could be further from the truth.TALON1973 said:also i have a slight concern on how long i can expect teh quality of my downloads to last ? and if i can re-download at no cost to me in the future ? anyone know ?
The_Lhc said:Sorry, are you saying you're expecting the quality of a digital file to degrade over time? Nothing could be further from the truth.TALON1973 said:also i have a slight concern on how long i can expect teh quality of my downloads to last ? and if i can re-download at no cost to me in the future ? anyone know ?
DIB said:Sorry to hijack this thread, but where can you source these 96/24 downloads? ...
TALON1973 said:...are all the tracks the[y] do direct rips from sacd / hd audio sources then ?
TALON1973 said:well there are a few online retailers that do hd audio ... but there are not alot of mainstream albums available
in this topic the music has come from https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php
the queen tracks your referign might have been sacd ... you sure it was a stream ?
6th.replicant said:DIB said:Sorry to hijack this thread, but where can you source these 96/24 downloads? ...
HDTracks
https://www.hdtracks.com/
If you're UK-based, it's worth noting that HD Tracks will only accept payment via PayPal.
DIB said:6th.replicant said:DIB said:Sorry to hijack this thread, but where can you source these 96/24 downloads? ...
HDTracks
https://www.hdtracks.com/
If you're UK-based, it's worth noting that HD Tracks will only accept payment via PayPal.
I've tried to register with HD Tracks but it wont accept my Email address ********.co.uk. Upon closer inspection it says USA only.
Pity really, they have plenty of stuff I'd like to investigate.
Any way around this perhaps?