Having purchased a Denon DM37 late last year, decided to put some better speakers with it to replace the old Sony things I had. Shortlisted the MA BR1s and the MS 902i. Unfortunately unable to compare both in the same conditions. Severnoaks Bristol don't do the MS and Richer don't do the MA. After much walking between the two (luckily they're pretty close to each other) I plumped for the BR1s. Definate improvement on what I had previously so am really happy with the system.
However, it's got me thinking. People who buy micro all in ones are probably doing so because of space restrictions, so will more than likely buy bookshelf type speakers for the same reason. This also means that the speakers are more than likely to be positioned on or very close to a wall. The BR1 speaker is rear ported, so is probably more likely to create bass boom than a front ported unit in the same position. MA do supply foam bungs to block the port to prevent this occurring.
2 Questions
1. The port is there for a reason, so what does putting a bung in it do to the performance of the speaker?
2. Would a front ported speaker be a better option when positioning on or close to a wall?
However, it's got me thinking. People who buy micro all in ones are probably doing so because of space restrictions, so will more than likely buy bookshelf type speakers for the same reason. This also means that the speakers are more than likely to be positioned on or very close to a wall. The BR1 speaker is rear ported, so is probably more likely to create bass boom than a front ported unit in the same position. MA do supply foam bungs to block the port to prevent this occurring.
2 Questions
1. The port is there for a reason, so what does putting a bung in it do to the performance of the speaker?
2. Would a front ported speaker be a better option when positioning on or close to a wall?